I’m guessing it’s going to be about the expansion, but unless things have changed in the last month, I don’t think it’s going to include the Lions Den. I’ll see if I can do some digging though 👀
I don't think Banksy has ever confirmed any involvement in Terminal 1 but I think there's little doubt about it, especially as he was active at the festival this year.
People still selling them as Banksy on ebay
I think they were £15 each and selling for hundreds... chancers everywhere! 😞
I didn't say I'm concerned he's actually going to slap her did I? But I still think public threats of violence against women are repugnant. Would have thought that'd be fairly easy to agree on but there you go.
Yes they will have a motive, they'll be looking to get paid, Can't get paid if there's no offence. Given Cohen Davis specialise in online defamation, harassment, cyberbullying, social media litigation (whatever that is) and judging by their positive reviews, they seem to be good at getting paid.
With the greatest of respect, when it comes to what is and isn't illegal, I think on this occasion, when both the police and a law firm are saying the opposite to you, I'll take the word of two different professional bodies over some random stranger on the internet.
And they say that filming / photographing in public is perfectly legal, until you cross the line into harassment. It's up to the CPS and, ultimately, the courts to decide what does cross that line on a case by case basis.
Do you want licenses, and more restrictions? Because to me it seems the whole point of being able to bring these charges against people who overstep the freedoms we enjoy, is to avoid the need for more restrictions on those who don't overstep. It sounds like you, and others, would prefer more clear cut and better defined restrictions on public filming and photographing in general.