Glasto 2011 ?

[paulo999]

You mean you *speculate* that there is no need

As a choice of avoiding a *possible* conflict with the Olympics, I'd say 2012 fallow is the better choice.

And it might gives us an extra festival, depending on how they play it for the next run.

[sammysundae]

to be honest, i'd probably rather they cancelled the 2012 glasto. i'm a big music and sports fan. tickets for the olympics won;t be cheap and i probably wouldn;t be able to afford to go to both in the same year. not only that, but being able go to the olympics would ease the sting of having no glasto. i don't know why people are so worried. this just means it is longer until the next fallow year.

i'm surprised more people don't see it how i do.

please feel free to shoot me down.

[gooner1990]

The only thing would then mean

2012 OFF

2013 ON

2014 ON

2015 ON

2016 OFF

So only 3 in a row before back to the fallow years, or would they then switch the fallow years to ones ending in 2 and 7 ?!

[paulo999]

Your logic works for me sammy

[Spiderden]

This is what Michael Eavis said about it.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/music/a144199/...2012-clash.html

[LRW]

For f**k sakes people!!

We still have 2 festivals to go before then.

One of them being in 5 weeks.

So can I have some FOCUS please!!

[abu hamster]

Fallow = gap rest?

2012 sounds great to me as i may be competing

[gooner1990]