jump Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 I've not said that there's a causal link between chart positions and headline status. I've specifically agreed with someone who said that correlation isn't causality. That's obvious - if it were the case that bands were booked solely on their sales figues we'd be looking at headliners of JLS, Take That and Lady Gaga. I've said that the third variable which you would expect to have a causal relationship with both chart position and headline status is "size of band". A high album chart position in a bands career is good indicator that a band is big enough (or has been big enough) to headline Reading - provided they fit the more ovbious criteria of being appropriate for the festival. The only real conclusion I've suggested that you can draw is that if a band hasn't had a high charting UK album in their career, then they won't headline Reading and Leeds in their current state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieuphoria Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 The Darkness were fecking amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveElNino Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 That's a contradiction as if it was based on the career ie the past then it would have no baring on their current state. It'd be like saying Booby Charlton was a great footballer therefore he should be picked for England in the next World Cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a_kelaz Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 It does make L + R look bad if their headliners are subs at another no doubt. I think Nickleback would do well as a headliner, better than MCR anyway, Blur would be epic, but cant see it. Tbf Muse are awesome live and the strokes will def put on a good show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe- Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 Electric picnic is a week after and they announced some bands: Maybe some of these.. Pulp The Chemical Brothers Interpol PJ Harvey Beirut Jimmy Cliff DJ Shadow White Lies OMD Midlake The Charlatans Big Audio Dynamite The Go! Team Boys Noize Paul Kalkbrenner Twin Shadow Willy Mason Trentemoller Killing Joke Ivan St. John Dave Clarke Caitlin Rose HEALTH Mogwai O Emperor Adam Beyer The Danger is Adebisi Shank. Flying Lotus Mundy R.S.A.G. CODES The Walkmen LYKKIE LI Sharon Shannon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pink_triangle Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 Chart position isnt the only indicator but it cant be ignored. If a band struggles to scrape into the top 40 on a regualr basis they are clearly far less to headline than a band who consitetly get top 3 albums. If you look at the top 10 albums elling bands in the last 10 years, I suspect they have all headlined festivals. Its certainly not the only factor but clearly a band who gets more medi coverage will generally sell more albums and concert tickets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jump Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 I was thinking more that it shows that there's a demographic somewhere who would be interested in seeing them play. If a band has had a number 1 album in their career then there is a large number of people who have their albums - and thus may be interested in seeing them play. Obviously the greater in the past the high chart position, the less impact it has - but bands have generally supported their older chart topping positions with something more recent but still successful (excluding obviously those that have been on hiatus). The comparison with Bobby Charlton is a silly one to make as his relevant ability (footballing skill) has declined with age whereas bands who have had past number ones and are invited to headline R&L have demonstrated that their relevant ability (ability to attract fans - illustrated through record sales) is still strong. As for the current state bit - I'm referring to R&L in their current state (ie mainstream rock festivals) as opposed to what they were back in the early 90s or 80s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev1664 Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 It does make L + R look bad if their headliners are subs at another no doubt. I think Nickleback would do well as a headliner, better than MCR anyway, Blur would be epic, but cant see it. Tbf Muse are awesome live and the strokes will def put on a good show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveElNino Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 But as we saw last year, Libertines were booked to attract fans and Arcade Fire were booked to give a headliners performance which is based on ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benj Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 It does make L + R look bad if their headliners are subs at another no doubt. I think Nickleback would do well as a headliner, better than MCR anyway, Blur would be epic, but cant see it. Tbf Muse are awesome live and the strokes will def put on a good show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leyser Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 Electric picnic is a week after and they announced some bands: Maybe some of these.. Pulp The Chemical Brothers Interpol PJ Harvey Beirut Jimmy Cliff DJ Shadow Big Audio Dynamite HEALTH Mogwai Flying Lotus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j-j-j-j-joe! Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 Arcade Fire had shown the ability to attract fans. Maybe not as many as most headliners, but they had had a #2 UK album, sold out 3 nights at a 9000 capacity venue in London and done an arena tour. It's not as if FR had thrown The National, Animal Collective or LCD Soundsystem out as headliners (bands with a similar critical response, but nowhere near the commercial success that AF had had) because they didn't have the commercial support to back it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveElNino Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 When the line-up was announced/they were booked they'd only had a number 2 album (damn those Kaiser Chiefs) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sort it out Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 I read these forums a lot but recently I’m seeing less and less reason to this thread is for the line-up for this year’s festival and yet the last three pages are an argument about how chart positions of albums sometimes indicates the headliners. Surly the posts should be line up rumours with sources indicated so they can be checked by the rest of the community. If the post is just to say who you wish was playing there are other threads for that. Because at the moment the only reasonably safe bet is muse. We need more credible information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SamSheppard Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 Because at the moment the only reasonably safe bet is muse. We need more credible information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtourette Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 I read these forums a lot but recently I’m seeing less and less reason to this thread is for the line-up for this year’s festival and yet the last three pages are an argument about how chart positions of albums sometimes indicates the headliners. Surly the posts should be line up rumours with sources indicated so they can be checked by the rest of the community. If the post is just to say who you wish was playing there are other threads for that. Because at the moment the only reasonably safe bet is muse. We need more credible information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englishdragon Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 (edited) I was looking at some old line ups and its amazing how many bands rumoured were playing in 2002. Which is good as 2002 was the best line up to a festival I never went to. Strokes Pulp (playing below strokes) Muse Feeder The Steets The Offspring Jimmy Eat World Just hope we get some of the other bands that played that year Slipknot Incubus NoFX Less Than Jake reel Big Fish Andrew wk:) Edited March 10, 2011 by Leeds_Brett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jump Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 I read these forums a lot but recently I’m seeing less and less reason to this thread is for the line-up for this year’s festival and yet the last three pages are an argument about how chart positions of albums sometimes indicates the headliners. Surly the posts should be line up rumours with sources indicated so they can be checked by the rest of the community. If the post is just to say who you wish was playing there are other threads for that. Because at the moment the only reasonably safe bet is muse. We need more credible information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sftiz Posted March 11, 2011 Report Share Posted March 11, 2011 Friday Main: Muse My Chemical Romance 30 Seconds to Mars Feeder Sum 41 Good Charlotte Funeral for a Friend Fightstar Taking Back Sunday Anti Flag NME: Florence and the Machine Jamie T Friendly Fires Saturday Main: The Strokes Pulp Elbow Vampire Weekend MGMT The XX Two Door Cinema Club Bombay Bicycle Club Los Campesinos! NME: Soundgarden Them Crooked Vultures Less Than Jake Sunday Main: The Pixies Smashing Pumpkins Interpol The Offspring Jimmy Eat World Death From Above 1979 Panic! at the Disco Eagles of Death Metal Mystery Jets Kids in Glass Houses NME: Crystal Castles Magnetic Man Hadouken! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eFestivals Posted March 11, 2011 Report Share Posted March 11, 2011 Florence defo isn't doing any fests this year - so we can all leave the ear-plugs at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beards Posted March 11, 2011 Report Share Posted March 11, 2011 Florence defo isn't doing any fests this year - so we can all leave the ear-plugs at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hart Attack Posted March 11, 2011 Report Share Posted March 11, 2011 Are LTJ and RBF exclusive to Slam Dunk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jump Posted March 11, 2011 Report Share Posted March 11, 2011 Are LTJ and RBF exclusive to Slam Dunk? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingOfTheRodeo Posted March 11, 2011 Report Share Posted March 11, 2011 (edited) Not gonna trawl through all 49 pages to look but there are a few acts who I haven't really seen mentioned that I expect to see on the final line up. I know not everyone's cup of tea but i expect to see the majority of the following 'Indie Fodder' : James Blake - NME Noah and the Whale - Main/High NME Dead Confederate - FR The Whigs - FR/low NME Hot club de paris - FR/low NME Iron and Wine - mid NME First Aid Kit- FR/NME Johnny Flynn- FR/NME Funeral Party - NME Chapel Club - NME Vaccines - NME Toyko Police Club - NME Feel free to correct me on any Edited March 11, 2011 by KingOfTheRodeo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calzum Posted March 11, 2011 Report Share Posted March 11, 2011 (edited) Florence defo isn't doing any fests this year - so we can all leave the ear-plugs at home. Edited March 11, 2011 by Calzum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts