Jump to content
We've just launched our new store! Unique tees, mugs, bags, and more. 10% discount with code OPEN10

  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

The Sun wants us to grass on our scrounging neighbours :)

Guest oafc0000

By Guest oafc0000
in Discussions

 Share

Recommended Posts

oafc0000 Newbie

oafc0000

Posted
Posted

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/3091717/The-Sun-declares-war-on-Britains-benefits-culture.html

Found the article pretty funny...

Me thinks they can both expect their JSA to be cut etc...

Chris quit his job and neither are interested in finding a job... How f**king stupid can they be... He must of lied when claiming surely :) Reckon they can expect a visit :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eFestivals Mentor

eFestivals

Posted
Posted (edited)

In about 1980, there was a TV programme about similar "benefit scum" (it might have been Panorama, tho might have been another similar documentary programme, I forget now).

Anyway, people watching it back today would be rather surprised to recognise the main 'example' of these 'benefit scum' used in the programme - he goes by the name of Danny Baker (yes, that one). He was paid to act as a benefit claimant and present made-up bollox of how great his life was on the dole.

It's from this faked programme that much of the myth of dole scroungers has been developed.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites
eFestivals Mentor

eFestivals

Posted
Posted

We can talk all day about the level of the problem but to call it a myth is a bit laughable really...

in the scheme of things its defo a myth - even the Sun's campaign makes that clear is your brain is switched on.

80% of the benefits 'loss' is not down to "scroungers" at all, but is the result of govt administrative incompetence.

And against the £1Bn or so which is down to fraud needs to be balanced the amount of unclaimed benefits - which means that if the Scum means all that they say and their campaign has the desired result, the result of their campaign is a huge extra cost to the country in extra benefit payments and not any saving.

After all, they say "Social security should be a safety net for those in need .... No one begrudges those who genuinely cannot find work despite their best efforts."

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RABun Newbie

RABun

Posted
Posted

I love how the Sun is up in arms because they got £300 worth of B&Q Vouchers to decorate their house. The council do that when the house is in a state as its cheaper and more time efficient to get people to decorate it themselves than to pay a team of people to do it.

Also they don't explain how they bought the Xbox etc, very unlikely they could pay for it with their benefits so it was probably a present, or bought on credit with an extortionate catalogue or a provi loan. And who's business is it what they spend their money on?

I really don't think £17k a year is very much considering that includes all their rent, council tax, bills, food etc. I would think it very likely that certain bills etc aren't being paid because, the money gets spent down the pub or on fags, rather than the fact that they have too much money in benefit. They do include child benefit in that calculation too which everybody gets whether they are a rich or poor.

Why don't they make child benefit means tested? would that not save a fortune?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve P Newbie

Steve P

Posted
Posted

Also they don't explain how they bought the Xbox etc, very unlikely they could pay for it with their benefits so it was probably a present, or bought on credit with an extortionate catalogue or a provi loan. And who's business is it what they spend their money on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eFestivals Mentor

eFestivals

Posted
Posted

I thought it could be fairly easily applied using a tax code deduction at source, or something like that.

that's not means testing tho - that's only income testing.

Essentially, true means testing would end up being the same thing as exists for tax credits currently - it works on income, and what are considered necessary expenses for a person's situation (living costs, number of kids, etc) against that income.

But if tax credits are to be continued with, then it wouldn't be hugely difficult to merge child benefit into that tax credits system - and that would avoid the costs of means testing for child benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RABun Newbie

RABun

Posted
Posted

The readers of The Sun, The Mail and The Express of course. The obvious way forward is if you're on benefits is that you don't get any money paid to you, just have utilities bills paid and recieve a food parcel once a week. Surely nobody would think that was unfair :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smog Newbie

smog

Posted
Posted (edited)

They probably got a couple of hundred quid from The Sun too. He should get a ps3 \o/

£17k doesnt seem a lot with 2 kids though and its not like he could just walk in to a job at the minute.

Edited by smog
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Budweiser Newbie

Budweiser

Posted
Posted

Also they don't explain how they bought the Xbox etc, very unlikely they could pay for it with their benefits so it was probably a present, or bought on credit with an extortionate catalogue or a provi loan. And who's business is it what they spend their money on?

I really don't think £17k a year is very much considering that includes all their rent, council tax, bills, food etc. I would think it very likely that certain bills etc aren't being paid because, the money gets spent down the pub or on fags, rather than the fact that they have too much money in benefit. They do include child benefit in that calculation too which everybody gets whether they are a rich or poor.

Why don't they make child benefit means tested? would that not save a fortune?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...