"Human Rights" --European Court

[diddly-dee]

If you're unable to follow such simple referencing, these forums are not for you.

If what you're doing in this post with the tripe you've waffled above is what you are calling "merely forum banter", then these forums are not for you.

And if you still don't know what I'm talking about then these forums are not for you.

Time to come clean Den. Is there a brain rattling around in your head, or not?

[eFestivals]

Remember, prophets are seldom understood in their own time.

Yeah, that's what worm likes to believe of himself too.

[rabid]

If you're unable to follow such simple referencing, these forums are not for you.

[eFestivals]

I think the part Den was getting at in the part he'd highlighted was the bit about 'constant misplaced fantasies about what you think I've said but haven't'.

I know I don't read all pages of all threads and might have missed something, but you'd think if it was constant then I would come across it more.

well, given that we got to here by someone else going along the "I think the part Den was getting at ..." route, I ain't going there again.

But it's certainly the case that we've also got to here because of his fantasies about what he thinks I've said, but which I haven't.

[gratedenini]

OMG.. since my last visit.. I`ve been gently tapping the outer casing of the laptop and dancing round the front room with me Orange Hat on... hoping and praying for a Worm to recscue the situation!

Whilst my (seemingly) Good Friend, DD has most articulately demostrated his logic upon the case... I am still unable to form a credulous reason to nullify Aesops fall from 100% compliance.

The offending post did seem to imply that I could easily be a bed fellow for Nick Clegg of the BNP.

Now--- unlike the exiled Oafish who could and in fact often did copiously post whilst in charge of Annabel... I shall not perform such a crime..and do so announce my semi-retirement from this afternoons banter because of the arrival of The King of The World and his younger sibling to my humble abode.

Dans le jardine Nuit! ... au revoir!

den

[rabid]

well, given that we got to here by someone else going along the "I think the part Den was getting at ..." route, I ain't going there again.

But it's certainly the case that we've also got to here because of his fantasies about what he thinks I've said, but which I haven't.

[eFestivals]

So, far from the 'constant misplaced fantasies' that you mentioned, we have one example where Den missed the link you made between Ferals interpretation of what he said and the BNPs views on foreigners?

it might have passed you by, but this is far from the first time he's done something like that.

[rabid]

it might have passed you by, but this is far from the first time he's done something like that.

[eFestivals]

rabid ... is something only the case if you've seen it?

[llcoolphil]

it depends where you're looking at things from.

If you're the person applying your subjective notion of right and wrong equally and fairly to all people, then it's very definitely the case that you're applying your subjectivity in a universal manner.

C'mon .... have you and others been on the stupid pills?

[eFestivals]

I can say that my favourite colour is red and in every circumstance stick with that. I am applying my subjective position universally. Doesnt mean that red as a favourite colour is universal though.

absolutely right.

And I've not said a similar thing, that justice is universal.

So it's all good. Apart from in worm's head of course, but that's nothing new.

[worm]

OMG.. since my last visit.. I`ve been gently tapping the outer casing of the laptop and dancing round the front room with me Orange Hat on... hoping and praying for a Worm to recscue the situation!

Edited February 22, 2011 by worm

[worm]

absolutely right.

And I've not said a similar thing, that justice is universal.

So it's all good. Apart from in worm's head of course, but that's nothing new.

Edited February 22, 2011 by worm

[eFestivals]

I've been watching the cricket mate and I'd become entirely bored of conversing with an idiot. I don't mean that as a personal insult, I quite literally mean a vessel of idiocy.

I wouldn't for one moment take seriously anything a proven idiot had said. If he's made his mind up then that's that. An appeal to logic won't work. What you'll get instead are threats based upon an abuse of power born out of frustration.

What you've become is very clearly wrong. What you've become is an arsehole trying to pick an argument with me by pretending that I'd said something I'd not.

You've given up cos you can no longer even troll with any skill. Oh well, how sad, never mind.

As I've said previously, there's a standard way of dealing with trolls here. I've given waaaay too much leeway with you for it up to now, so it's really not going to get stretched much longer.

The only "abuse of power" that's going on is me having given you that leeway. But you're right about frustration; there3's only so much worthless bollocks a man can take.

How's your important research going BTW? Are you finding it too difficult still?

[worm]

Yawn!

[eFestivals]

Apart from accusing Phil of taking stupid pills for being entirely correct, contradicting him with something that didn't contradict him, stating universal rules to justice having said that it was entirely subjective and agreeing that justice was in fact universal.

If I've been "stating universal rules to justice having said that it was entirely subjective and agreeing that justice was in fact universal", then you'll be able to show me where I've said that, won't you?

Oh dear, you can't. That'll be you being wrong yet again.

Oh dear how sad never mind.

[eFestivals]

Yawn!

When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed.

You should try it sometime. I recommend all the time.

[gratedenini]

I've been watching the cricket mate and I'd become entirely bored of conversing with an idiot. I don't mean that as a personal insult, I quite literally mean a vessel of idiocy.

I wouldn't for one moment take seriously anything a proven idiot had said. If he's made his mind up then that's that. An appeal to logic won't work. What you'll get instead are threats based upon an abuse of power born out of frustration.

[worm]

Anyway-- I still await your verdict on the -1 I awarded to Aesop earlier on and your take on the reply of DD.

[eFestivals]

Still only empty bollocks I see worm.

You'll be needing to produce where I've been "stating universal rules to justice having said that it was entirely subjective and agreeing that justice was in fact universal" to prove you're not a troll.

Because as you so rightly point out, it would be wrong of me to abuse my position by not implementing the rules here evenly.

Edited February 22, 2011 by eFestivals

[worm]

I'm sure I just heard something......

[eFestivals]

I'm sure I just heard something......

yep, you did. The sound of your own empty words.

[gratedenini]

It's a fairly straight-forward ethical principle: I wouldn't have given him the satisfaction.

As to the issue of double D's, I've always found them a little on the large side. I'm of the 'anything more than a handful is a waste' school of thought. I'm not a strict adherer of the discipline though.

[llcoolphil]

U

What you've become is very clearly wrong. What you've become is an arsehole trying to pick an argument with me by pretending that I'd said something I'd not.

You've given up cos you can no longer even troll with any skill. Oh well, how sad, never mind.

As I've said previously, there's a standard way of dealing with trolls here. I've given waaaay too much leeway with you for it up to now, so it's really not going to get stretched much longer.

The only "abuse of power" that's going on is me having given you that leeway. But you're right about frustration; there3's only so much worthless bollocks a man can take.

How's your important research going BTW? Are you finding it too difficult still?

[eFestivals]

I wish you'd f**k off with this troll idiocy. You are the only one who thinks he’s trolling and anyone who says they agree with you is being a sycophantic twat. How can it be that when you’re in aminority of one thats not trolling but when someone disagrees with you they are?

Is any of this about disagreeing with me, or not agreeing with me. I don't think so.

And I do love your resorting to bullying in advance, particularly amusing given your own words elsewhere. Waaaaay to go.

Have I been "stating universal rules to justice having said that it was entirely subjective and agreeing that justice was in fact universal"? Then he should be able to show where I have.

He can't, because it's trolling. But not very good trolling.

If you and your chummies want to keep on going as you're going, you're welcome to.

Edited February 22, 2011 by eFestivals