Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Who is the 3rd headliner likely to be?


Guest adele92

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think people are reading way too much into that quote.

Look at what the lack of clues does to us :P

Green Day would make more sense than Sabbath or Linkin Park, they'd be a far more popular announcemen on line-up day next month. They'd also be stronger than The Prodigy. The emirates gig and their tour dates suggest it won't be them though.

My money is still on Blur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Green day could make sense yes, but with a secret set last year and Billie joe in rehab, it kind of doesn't make sense too, right?

I'd say they make as much sense as lp do, rage doing the same 2008 show again do, and blur performing above system of a down do. Can make sense, but also don't.

Edited by Asdaprice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be delighted with Green day. Huge fan but I'm not very hopeful seeing as logistically it would make little/no sense. The reasons have been brought up over and over. I remain pessimistic about seeing them. I'm going to the Emirates anyway, but it would be awesome to see them at my favourite festival too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get it, so are you saying bands who played more recently at reading should be having the higher slots? Festivals should chop and change year on year, and what I'm saying is having bands that last played 10 so years ago is variety from having repeats from sooner then that. Yes those bands have existed and played previous readings but a lot of goers wouldn't have been there in the early 2000s, so, because the bands are still relevant, I do feel its fresh yes. Your argument about moving forward, should they just give high slots to future stars all the time? Keeps it different i guess but wouldn't have the epic ness of sets of albums worth of material.
Edited by thesecretingredientiscrime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I'm not saying that. It's fairly obvious that constantly rebooking older acts from the festivals past not only harms R&L's development, it harms all festivals developments. Unless you book new acts, the pool of acts available for the top of festivals gets smaller and smaller. It doesn't really help r&l to book acts who played ten years
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...