I had predicted Fred, Oasis and said female. Right now it would be Sabrina I think being the target. There is information of negotiations and I reckon that is more to line her up for 2027 than fit in this year.
Noel has said a piece about this is basically and in and out swansong, I think they both retire when this is done because who's going to watch even Liam separately sing what they just did together to how many people? Glastonbury taking 2026 off hasn't been done if there is as any idea that Oasis will only last for 25 and 26 and they would have got info. I don't think Glastonbury could afford to take 27 off with Oasis around and made it so they had both 27 and 28 to go at. It might be a long shot but I think the fallow early may have had more to do with Oasis than Taylor being available. I would be surprised if Oasis went on longer than 27 but there is a slight chance they might do two years, have a break just to keep the iron got.
I feel Fred, Oasis, Sabrina, Sam Fender, Chappell and Fontaines are a very good prediction to cover their next two running years. Obviously anything could happen before then but you've 3 up and coming options to include females in as well you'd think they would take advantage of two of them over those years.
Yeah, potentially it can change and hopefully it will. As the Sunday is already sold out, they need to create some diversity to push combi tickets. Sunday is also the day I'm talking about. I don't know if genre heavy is the term, but it would be a long shot to call anything of what's announced a rock act at least. It's definitely a day centered around a younger audience though, that's for sure. If they had spread those artists between the four days, I wouldn't have lifted an eyebrow (although I don't see Rodrigo as a RW-headliner, I wouldn't mind she being there).
I also find it a bit strange, that a festival that has maybe had 1-2 EDM acts a day, suddenly has three among the first ones announced in one day. Again, not saying it's wrong, but why not spread them?