JoeyT Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 like that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil999 Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 ahh man really promising, makes me want them to headline again now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nal Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 It sounds like hes taken one of the tracks from Hounds of Love, played it on karaoke version and then sang over it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil999 Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 It sounds like hes taken one of the tracks from Hounds of Love, played it on karaoke version and then sang over it. boo hiss to you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wooderson Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 It's ace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brettredmayne Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 Looking forward to this album more and more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Placid Casual Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 I won tickets to see Blur today, but it's an earlier 3pm show and I can't make it. That really really sucks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdm22 Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 ??? There's a 3pm show? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Placid Casual Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 ??? There's a 3pm show? Yep, due to overwhelming response apparently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdm22 Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 So that means I didn't win tickets to two shows then? Annoying! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Placid Casual Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 I can't believe I won to be honest. The lady on the phone only decided to tell me it was for the 3pm show after I'd won mind, so that was a huge downer. There's only 6 hours a week of uni which I can't miss as I'd drop grades (plus an extra 14 on top of that), and it had to fall during those! I wonder what the location is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil999 Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 I can't believe I won to be honest. The lady on the phone only decided to tell me it was for the 3pm show after I'd won mind, so that was a huge downer. There's only 6 hours a week of uni which I can't miss as I'd drop grades (plus an extra 14 on top of that), and it had to fall during those! I wonder what the location is. surely you can miss one afternoon for goodness sakes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Placid Casual Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 (edited) surely you can miss one afternoon for goodness sakes! Nope, it's 30% of a module, not really worth it. Too little too late now anyway. Edited March 20, 2015 by WessexBoy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuartbert two hats Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 "For now" ? Irrespective of whether you like their new material theyve a new album that will form the backbone of any new shows. So Russy's point is utter cobblers. As is yours. Perfectly willing to debate the quality of the stuff with you - but to be so dismissive and snidey about it is a dickmove. Atypical dickmove from you Scoot it has to be said. Youve been knocking Blur on eFests for years. It really depends on the reception to the album. The Rolling Stones have released plenty of albums since the 80s, but have been a heritage act all that time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nal Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 It really depends on the reception to the album. The Rolling Stones have released plenty of albums since the 80s, but have been a heritage act all that time. Can;t see the yoof grabbing and hold of the new tune and going with it. First one was good mind you. Both very obviously wearing their influences on their sleeves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wooderson Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 Can;t see the yoof grabbing and hold of the new tune and going with it. First one was good mind you. Both very obviously wearing their influences on their sleeves. It's a guaranteed number one album mate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuartbert two hats Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 Does make me think - if an act plays mainly new stuff when the audience go hoping to hear the hits, are they a heritage act or not? I dunno. Russy is right about one thing, Radiohead really aren't a heritage act, (I reckon) most people who go to see them actually want to hear the new songs live. I was exceedingly happy with the set list at the MEN during the KOL tour. One OK Computer song, I think? Plenty of older songs, but most of the new album, really transformed. I can't think of any other band who has managed to get away with featuring new stuff heavily for so long. It's not like Shakin' Stevens playing new songs and not playing Green Door, arrogant fucker. He certainly was heritage, even if he didn't think he was! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wooderson Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 It would be fairly surprising / big news if Radiohead played a "classics" set. Much as i admire them for expansive and courageous stuff theyve put out in the last 15 years - people would lose their shit if they played "Anyone Can Play Guitar". Fair point Stuart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil999 Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 (edited) Does make me think - if an act plays mainly new stuff when the audience go hoping to hear the hits, are they a heritage act or not? I dunno. Russy is right about one thing, Radiohead really aren't a heritage act, (I reckon) most people who go to see them actually want to hear the new songs live. I was exceedingly happy with the set list at the MEN during the KOL tour. One OK Computer song, I think? Plenty of older songs, but most of the new album, really transformed. I can't think of any other band who has managed to get away with featuring new stuff heavily for so long. It's not like Shakin' Stevens playing new songs and not playing Green Door, arrogant fucker. He certainly was heritage, even if he didn't think he was! if they headlined, they could play 6 songs off the album and ditch some of the old obscure stuff they played last time i mean how many casual fans know popscene and oily water? theres also loads of 'hits' they didnt play- MOR,on your own, sing(not really a hit but quite famous cos of trainspotting) stereotypes, charmless man etc etc Edited March 20, 2015 by neil999 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wooderson Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 Personally I think the pejorative term "heritage band" is someone from the 60/70s primarily. By definition "not" playing any of your old stuff is counterproductive and alienating for any band. Blur's setlist in 2012 was a lot different to the 2009 list with some stuff "Caramel" frinstance being debuted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russycarps Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 Does make me think - if an act plays mainly new stuff when the audience go hoping to hear the hits, are they a heritage act or not? I dunno. Russy is right about one thing, Radiohead really aren't a heritage act, (I reckon) most people who go to see them actually want to hear the new songs live. I was exceedingly happy with the set list at the MEN during the KOL tour. One OK Computer song, I think? Plenty of older songs, but most of the new album, really transformed. I can't think of any other band who has managed to get away with featuring new stuff heavily for so long. It's not like Shakin' Stevens playing new songs and not playing Green Door, arrogant fucker. He certainly was heritage, even if he didn't think he was! flaming lips are another band who's gigs are heavily weighted in favour of their newer stuff I'd say Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaledonianGonzo Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 flaming lips are another band who's gigs are heavily weighted in favour of their newer stuff I'd say Only if by "newer" you mean the Soft Bulletin / Yoshimi-era. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Placid Casual Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 I could have gone to that blur show I won tickets for. I feel sick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hurdy Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 Run. Plead with their management when you get there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil999 Posted March 20, 2015 Report Share Posted March 20, 2015 I could have gone to that blur show I won tickets for. I feel sick. aah man that is a shitter, bad luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.