Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Indeed they did. But i bet Arsenal had more than one striker at the club at the time. And LVG is not a developer of players in the way Wenger is. Are you really saying Utd don't need another striker??? Depay won't be anything special next season and Di Maria has never been much of a goalscorer.

Well the 2nd/3rd strikers at Chelsea, arsenal and city aren't anything special either, so he will be in good company. I think Man Utd would benefit ftom another striker if the right one becomes available. Then again considering Januzaj is the next big wonderkid of world football, maybe they could convert him!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the 2nd/3rd strikers at Chelsea, arsenal and city aren't anything special either, so he will be in good company. I think Man Utd would benefit ftom another striker if the right one becomes available. Then again considering Januzaj is the next big wonderkid of world football, maybe they could convert him!!

Lots of the old sarcasm from you tonight pink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the 2nd/3rd strikers at Chelsea, arsenal and city aren't anything special either, so he will be in good company. I think Man Utd would benefit ftom another striker if the right one becomes available. Then again considering Januzaj is the next big wonderkid of world football, maybe they could convert him!!

I can't tell if this is tongue in cheek or a serious comment. 

Edited by Celery
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still early yet, but do you guys usually have a efests fantasy football league?

If not anyone up for getting one up and running for the new season?

Would just have to decide on which site to use? The Sun, Fantasy Premier League or Telegraph FF?

Any interest?

There's a FPL one. Standard's not up to much though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious comment, admittedly City are slightly harder to assess as Bony is a bit of an unknown quantity still at a top club.

 

Fair enough. I'd still put Remy, Giroud (assuming Sanchez plays up top), Bony & Dzeko comfortably above Depay as backup strikers. 

Course he did - I confused him with bergkamp.

Ignore me

That was Rioch wasn't it. I'm sure he played Ian Wright on the wing for a bit. Nutter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(assuming Sanchez plays up top)

He doesn't, and he won't (as first choice).

Anyway, Chelsea have Costa, Remy and Falcao, and City have Agüero, Bony, Jovetic and Dzeko. They definitely have good back ups.

Arsenal only really have Giroud as an out and out striker, but have Walcott, Sanchez and Welbeck to cover the position, with plenty of cover on the wings to allow this.

They all have good second and third options if their main strikers are out. United only have Wilson.

Anyway if United have Schneiderlin then that, along with Schweinsteiger, is a great signing. My main issue with the Schweinsteiger signing was that it's a short term fix and could allow Morgan to go elsewhere. Now I see no negatives to the signing and that midfield is stacked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a great bit of business for City, sterling being the new ronaldo and all that.

 

#stats

 

He's the best prospect in Europe, and his stats better Skippy's at a young age even tho Sterling has played in a worse team.

 

It might turn out to be a fuck up by City, but they'll get better value from Sterling than Utd got from RvP, that much is guaranteed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Qpr getting best part of 10m from the sterling deal.

 

it's exactly £9M they get. 20%, less the fee that Liverpool paid for Sterling (£800k).

 

Whatever else Liverpool might be doing wrong you can't knock them for player development in the last few seasons, they've picked up some very decent dosh via the players they've signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...