What i think it might lead to, is perhaps a tightening of the law of being photographed/filmed in public. In the same way the upskirt law came in, when someone got upskirted at a festival. As currently it is a very grey area, with no boundaries for women unless upskirted.
How can they tighten the law? Now that is really difficult.
For example if I photographed a guys face twice on 2 different occasions during street photography, that is technically harrasment. If I followed a nightclub lady for 5 minutes filming every movement then that isn't harrasment.
There are certain countries that have banned all public photography, France and Hungary are 2 if memory serves me right.
The Duran clue I've seen on the C&T Facebook page is Hungry like the wolf in emojis, specific to the Essex events - that's definitely bigger events than Piece Hall and Scarborough - more like Lytham/Cardiff.
They are staggering them across the morning, so probably some different acts in there.
Yeah, it's the KOL booking that's thrown me as before that I thought there was a good chance of Pulp but as has been said maybe they are not as expensive as we thought.
That would be quiet a due KOL & Pulp, would not really care who the third would be.
Nope, that is exactly the problem, and is why he was arrested, by professionals, who will be acting on a little more understanding of the situation than us social media commentators.
What people choose to wear is never an excuse for predatory behaviour.
But as @thetime has tried to say, let's keep the thread on topic, and discuss whether this behaviour is passable under current rights to film and photograph in public, whether it should be passable, whether it comes under any other laws, such as stalking and harassment, and what the implications are, if any, to those that film and take photos in public without being a nuisance.
On the subject of filming in public. I've had my own concerns about auditors in the last few years, not because I think that what they are doing is fundamentally wrong, most of the time it isn't. But because I feel that, if they keep pushing boundaries, then we'll all lose the right the fly a drone in the open sub 250g category, wherever we like, and may even face more restrictions on public filming in general.