Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


guypjfreak

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
2 hours ago, Ayrshire Chris said:

Nice!
that mysterious hand on his shoulder in the photo I posted is mine but I’ve cropped my old image out of it. I’m not worthy! 😊😉

 

Fabulous. I was a little too 'away with it' earlier to notice the hand. Now that you have pointed it out, I think it an excellent 'item' to retain on the photo. Nice 'n' weird looking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Confirmed my official date for early retirement will definitely be 31/03/25 and put my last day in my outlook calendar for 28/03/25!😀 Was meant to be this year but due to changes in team and other people leaving I agreed to stay until end of financial year and see through a couple of programmes. 
 So currently planning a month in Australia after Easter next year 😀Life’s too short! To be fair nearly 40 years in local authority children’s services is enough for anyone so am very happy with my decision! 

  • Like 5
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sedra said:

Confirmed my official date for early retirement will definitely be 31/03/25 and put my last day in my outlook calendar for 28/03/25!😀 Was meant to be this year but due to changes in team and other people leaving I agreed to stay until end of financial year and see through a couple of programmes. 
 So currently planning a month in Australia after Easter next year 😀Life’s too short! To be fair nearly 40 years in local authority children’s services is enough for anyone so am very happy with my decision! 

Well deserved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, sedra said:

Confirmed my official date for early retirement will definitely be 31/03/25 and put my last day in my outlook calendar for 28/03/25!😀 Was meant to be this year but due to changes in team and other people leaving I agreed to stay until end of financial year and see through a couple of programmes. 
 So currently planning a month in Australia after Easter next year 😀Life’s too short! To be fair nearly 40 years in local authority children’s services is enough for anyone so am very happy with my decision! 

 

I would bet my conkers on the fact that you will not regret this move. I found myself incarcerated in a single work environment for 28 years. My own fault, mind. I just gave up at an early age. I don't regret not going far. I never intended to get far. In the end though, I just didn't want to be there anymore. So, I fortunately managed to orchestrate my own redundancy. It was a skillful little manoeuvre. Probably my best work to date. Anyway, I digress (as ever). What I'm trying to say is that you now get to go to the ball. Have the time of your life. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

I would bet my conkers on the fact that you will not regret this move. I found myself incarcerated in a single work environment for 28 years. My own fault, mind. I just gave up at an early age. I don't regret not going far. I never intended to get far. In the end though, I just didn't want to be there anymore. So, I fortunately managed to orchestrate my own redundancy. It was a skillful little manoeuvre. Probably my best work to date. Anyway, I digress (as ever). What I'm trying to say is that you now get to go to the ball. Have the time of your life. 

I did try to apply for voluntary redundancy earlier in the year but they said they didn’t want to lose my post- now they are going to change it anyway and upgrade it 🙄 Still going🥳

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, sedra said:

I did try to apply for voluntary redundancy earlier in the year but they said they didn’t want to lose my post- now they are going to change it anyway and upgrade it 🙄 Still going🥳

 

It's a shame you can't get redundancy and also retire. When are they proposing to change and upgrade your position? If you hadn't said you were retiring would you have had to have applied for your own job, or any job where you work, so as not to be making yourself redundant? That's what happened to me - they said that you had to apply for a role within the new structure. I was also told (on the QT) that me and 3 other people wouldn't be got rid of. That's because we could do the other people's jobs but they couldn't do ours, So, they fully expected me to apply for my own job, but I applied for a directors job in another field. As one had to apply for 'a' job as not doing so was deemed to be making yourself redundant and they wouldn't pay out on that condition. So, I applied for a job that I was ill equipped to do. I had to go for an interview , do a written exam etc, with me knowing that I wouldn't get it, and them knowing that I was pulling a stroke on them. A case of having to do what needed to be done. I'm just wondering if there was any way for you to back peddle , pull off redundancy and then retire anyway, is all?

Edited by Yoghurt on a Stick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

It's a shame you can't get redundancy and also retire. When are they proposing to change and upgrade your position? If you hadn't said you were retiring would you have had to have applied for your own job, or any job where you work, so as not to be making yourself redundant? That's what happened to me - they said that you had to apply for a role within the new structure. I was also told (on the QT) that me and 3 other people wouldn't be got rid of. That's because we could do the other people's jobs but they couldn't do ours, So, they fully expected me to apply for my own job, but I applied for a directors job in another field. As one had to apply for 'a' job as not doing so was deemed to be making yourself redundant and they wouldn't pay out on that condition. So, I applied for a job that I was ill equipped to do. I had to go for an interview , do a written exam etc, with me knowing that I wouldn't get it, and them knowing that I was pulling a stroke on them. A case of having to do what needed to be done. I'm just wondering if there was any way for you to back peddle , pull off redundancy and then retire anyway, is all?

 

Imagine if they'd called your bluff and given you the directors job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2024 at 9:45 PM, philipsteak said:

 

Imagine if they'd called your bluff and given you the directors job!

 

I'm not sure that I have ever thought of that before reading your post above. I certainly can't recall doing so Mind you, it would appear that I have compromised my own memory, so don't know where accuracy really resides on this one. Shooting from the hip now, I'd say that I'd have been able to hack it.

 

I was a Building Maintenance Surveyor under the Maintenance Department. The directorship was for someone currently to head a new combined maintenance and development function department. So, the Maintenance department was merging with the Development Department, under a new overall name as the Asset Management Department. To cut a long story short, I observed many of the Development Department just cruising along, as they farmed all aspects of the project out to external companies eg Architects, Structural Engineers, - you name it, they farmed it out. Don't get me wrong though - all I ever did was farm work out, kind of. I did also have to identify faults with buildings and their services. However, my job meant that I had to know a lot about many types of buildings. The Development Department's job appeared to not necessitate having such an understanding.

 

The Maintenance Department were continually having to spend some of their budget helping the Development Department out, as they had f**ked up their figures, or some such and had no money to finish their projects. That meant our budgets were reduced. However, that's not what used to enrage me. I used to get enraged because when it  happened it meant that the tenants would have less spent on their property than was properly to be the case. The tenants had paid for the original sum that was granted to the Maintenance Department on the basis it was to be used for maintenance of their buildings. It was against all policies and good working practice It was wrong.

 

Anyway, I went a little off course there above. I do think that I could have pulled the combined departments job off.

 

PS - Thanks for providing me with that notion to have a wonder about. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

I'm not sure that I have ever thought of that before reading your post above. I certainly can't recall doing so Mind you, it would appear that I have compromised my own memory, so don't know where accuracy really resides on this one. Shooting from the hip now, I'd say that I'd have been able to hack it.

 

I was a Building Maintenance Surveyor under the Maintenance Department. The directorship was for someone currently to head a new combined maintenance and development function department. So, the Maintenance department was merging with the Development Department, under a new overall name as the Asset Management Department. To cut a long story short, I observed many of the Development Department just cruising along, as they farmed all aspects of the project out to external companies eg Architects, Structural Engineers, - you name it, they farmed it out. Don't get me wrong though - all I ever did was farm work out, kind of. I did also have to identify faults with buildings and their services. However, my job meant that I had to know a lot about many types of buildings. The Development Department's job appeared to not necessitate having such an understanding.

 

The Maintenance Department were continually having to spend some of their budget helping the Development Department out, as they had f**ked up their figures, or some such and had no money to finish their projects. That meant our budgets were reduced. However, that's not what used to enrage me. I used to get enraged because when it  happened it meant that the tenants would have less spent on their property than was properly to be the case. The tenants had paid for the original sum that was granted to the Maintenance Department on the basis it was to be used for maintenance of their buildings. It was against all policies and good working practice It was wrong.

 

Anyway, I went a little off course there above. I do think that I could have pulled the combined departments job off.

 

PS - Thanks for providing me with that notion to have a wonder about. 

All those building and construction related services being ‘farmed out’, up here most of that gets decided and contracts agreed at Masonic meetings😊😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...