news & politics:discussion

[steviewevie]

shocked to see COP president who also happens to be head of a UAE oil company speak up against the phase out of fossil fuels.

[steviewevie]

3 minutes ago, Neil said:

an awful lot isn't that, a growing proportion is going to people like me, the oldies disabled like me, long term disabilities caused by stoke (strokes happen to one in four people, mostly - but not always - in later life; i play football with a 25 year old guy who's had a stroke). this is a growing number of people currently because of the population peak. the inactivity caused by those disabilities, is going to cause an even greater amount of diabetes   - which has its own health service load.

 

these are not conditions caused by poverty

but people in poverty tend to have worse health than those that aren't...? So, it's a mix of inequality and an aging population.

[Neil]

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

but people in poverty tend to have worse health than those that aren't...? So, it's a mix of inequality and an aging population.

like cancer they're conditions caused by life, not poverty.

 

 

[Neil]

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

but people in poverty tend to have worse health than those that aren't...? So, it's a mix of inequality and an aging population.

even fit and clean-living Olympic athlete Michael johnson had a stroke, so its not something that can be avoided with lifestyle changes.

[Guest]

2 hours ago, steviewevie said:

Starmer says Thatcher was awesome.

Never thought I'd live to hear a Labour leader praising Margaret Thatcher. Shows how far the party has come (and also what it's left behind)

Edited December 3, 2023 by Ommadawn

[steviewevie]

44 minutes ago, Neil said:

like cancer they're conditions caused by life, not poverty.

 

 

disagree...poorer people likely to have worse diets and lifestyles which can lead to cancers.

[steviewevie]

42 minutes ago, Neil said:

even fit and clean-living Olympic athlete Michael johnson had a stroke, so its not something that can be avoided with lifestyle changes.

there's always outliers.

[steviewevie]

16 minutes ago, Ommadawn said:

Never thought I'd live to hear a Labour leader praising Margaret Thatcher. Shows how far the party has come (and also what it's left behind)

he was writing in the Telegraph...he's hardly going to call her an evil witch.

[steviewevie]

...but it hardly indicates a brave new world under Labour either.

Edited December 3, 2023 by steviewevie

[Guest]

Pretty much, bad faith brigade has to find something to pretend to be angry with. 

[Neil]

4 hours ago, steviewevie said:

disagree...poorer people likely to have worse diets and lifestyles which can lead to cancers.

Evidence shows the same incidences of cancer at all levels of wealth.

[steviewevie]

14 minutes ago, Neil said:

Evidence shows the same incidences of cancer at all levels of wealth.

Oh no it doesn't 

[steviewevie]

So Israel tells Gazan civilians to evacuate to the south of the strip, and now Israel is carrying out a ground invasion in the south. This has to stop. Biden needs to do more.

[steviewevie]

[Guest]

7 hours ago, steviewevie said:

he was writing in the Telegraph...he's hardly going to call her an evil witch.

He said she had effected "meaningful change”. What the hell did he mean by that? 3 Million unemployed, defeating the miners? Can anyone list any meaningful change that happened for the good during her premiership cos I'm struggling. As usual, Starmer didn't go into details so I'm none the wiser. 

[steviewevie]

48 minutes ago, Ommadawn said:

He said she had effected "meaningful change”. What the hell did he mean by that? 3 Million unemployed, defeating the miners? Can anyone list any meaningful change that happened for the good during her premiership cos I'm struggling. As usual, Starmer didn't go into details so I'm none the wiser. 

It was meaningful change, for better or worse depending on your point of view.

We're all Thatcher's children now.

 

[Guest]

3 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

It was meaningful change, for better or worse depending on your point of view.

We're all Thatcher's children now.

 

Thats all he said as well, you’d think he’d done something truly heinous with the way some have been going on today. Clearly people haven’t actually read the article and are just using it as an excuse to moan again. 

[steviewevie]

[steviewevie]

[steviewevie]

[Guest]

2 hours ago, Ozanne said:

Thats all he said as well, you’d think he’d done something truly heinous with the way some have been going on today. Clearly people haven’t actually read the article and are just using it as an excuse to moan again. 

So what was in the article that hasn't been mentioned? You appear to have Starmer's ear and are the font of all knowledge (as long as it's Twitter/X based, of course). What have I missed please as it seems to me that Starmer highly rates a previous Tory PM, a war criminal and a Labour prime minister from 1951.

[Neil]

6 hours ago, steviewevie said:

Oh no it doesn't 

so show me your evidence then. 😛 

[Neil]

3 hours ago, steviewevie said:

It was meaningful change, for better or worse depending on your point of view.

We're all Thatcher's children now.

 

 

it was meaningful change just not good change. anyone offended by starmers words needs to give their head a wobble.

[philipsteak]

10 hours ago, steviewevie said:

It was meaningful change, for better or worse depending on your point of view.

We're all Thatcher's children now.

 

I mean my mum has some pretty awful views but I didn't think they were that bad

[steviewevie]

6 hours ago, Neil said:

so show me your evidence then. 😛 

Cancer in the UK 2020: socio-economic deprivation (cancerresearchuk.org)