Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2025 Headliners


Guest

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

It'd be a great bit if The Post turns out to be BS.

I think it's worth keeping in reserve just in case everything in it turns out to be wrong.

 

... though admittedly Oasis not playing Glastonbury was in there and that's a given at this point given Oasis have gone "Nah" for doing it for this year at least, maybe even full stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

 

Nah plz leave it, I do think it sounds reasonable, but it's just that any one of us could have written something like that with an alt account for the lulz.

for sure ... gives a rough idea where we are anyway whoever the author is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SwallowOrSleepOnTheWetSpot said:

Nah plz leave it, I do think it sounds reasonable, but it's just that any one of us could have written something like that with an alt account for the lulz.

 

That's the thing. It might well turn out to be "right", but that doesn't necessarily prove anything given most of it was what were already knew / expected, and the stuff that wasn't probably can't ever be proven either way.

 

Still find it comical people are taking it seriously.

Edited by incident
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2024 at 10:20 AM, MarrigoldGloves said:

The Festival acknowledges that booking SZA was viewed as a mistake by many and is keen to learn from the small crowd, Contact has been made with her team post festival and the bookers are actually keen for SZA to return to the farm in the future although no actual plans are put in place at this point, the team don’t want SZA legacy with the festival to be perceived as a negative one. They will follow her career closely and it may be 10 or more years when she returns and as to what slot she occupies will entirely depend on career trajectory. 

 

There was emergency talk when Madonna pulled out about if Olivia Rodrigo could step in to take over and this would have been the festivals first choice, prior to speaking to Stevie Wonder who was at one point set to take over however health concerns meant that this was short lived due to health concerns.  However Olivia and her team wanted more time to prepare for a headline slot which has for some time been discussed and at time of writing has been agreed for the Friday headliner slot for 2025.  Although a young artist the booking team are more confident of her success due to her previous appearance at the festival being a success.  

 

The festival team has agreed that the best way to introduce big artists from the US that have quickly grown in popularity is by first pitching them in an afternoon slot on the Pyramid or Other prior to them headlining this was the mode used for Billie Eilish and is why the festival does not consider Olivia Rodrigo to be a risk. For this reason talks with breakout artists such as Chappell Roan or Sabrina Carpenter will be based around a festival debut appearance in an afternoon slot to gauge their success with Glastonbury crowds and not rushing them into a big slot, too early. 

 

The festival has not been in contact with Taylor Swift about headlining at anypoint since the festival cancellation this is not out of any negativity between the two teams but it's just not a possibility for Taylor in the immediate future, The Glastonbury team are hopeful that they can agree a lower than normal & cut with team Swift as her extremely high current fees would be out of reach for the festival and its thought that Taylor would still like to make the festival appearance once her current roadmap is cleared. 

 

Fred Again will headline Saturday at Glastonbury 2025, Prominent members of the Glastonbury booking team were on site at Reading festival to observe his show and are confident that he will be able to entertain a Pyramid crowd, the team is closely monitoring the growth in popularity of electronic music and will be using Fred Again’s headline set to establish if there may be future dance headliners on the Pyramid although at this point no names are mentioned. 

 

Oasis team have been non committal on any headline slot at Glastonbury in the coming years while completely ruling out 2025, there does not seem to be much interest in returning to the festival as the tour is mostly financial motivated and any benefits of playing Glastonbury such as increased streaming revenue has already been achieved by the reunion. However the answer is not yet officially no to a Glastonbury appearance at some point. 

 

From Pulp Jarvis Cocker specifically remains close to the festival booking team as an advisor on other musical acts but seemingly has ruled out any Pulp show on the farm. Pulp reunion has been enjoyed by the band a lot and they have prolonged the comeback longer than originally planned though they think there last show at Glastonbury is the one they want to be remembered for and so will most likely not play the festival again, though Jarvis will appear in some format to be determined at next year's festival. 

 

Rihanna is the booking team's strong leader to play the Sunday night headliner slot, the thinking after early departures last year they want the most prominent headline act to play the Sunday headliner slot this year and with two relatively new acts this will hopefully be Rihanna.  She has been on the festivals radar for many years and it was previously though financials might be a stumbling block it now appears that Rihanna is perhaps thinking of putting a lid on her musical career for good and wants to tick a last few boxes before an early retirement to focus on other ventures which includes an appearance at Glastonbury, She was very close to appearing at Glastonbury 2023 and remains keen.  

 

It's considered Stevie Wonder is considered as a good plan B to Rihanna though lingering health concerns last around if he could commit to such long shows again in the future.

 

Eminem is not a serious contender to headline despite media speculation, the booking team have discussed in the past and existing concerns remain in place. 

 

Lady Gaga is a name the festival would like to get, however her plans are not settling in as reasonable a time scale as the festival needs to lock in a headliner for next year. It looks like it's a no for 2025 however she remains a preferred target for future festivals. 

 

Sam Fender not on the booking teams radar for 2025, Sam is considered a headliner but with Olivia Rodrigo and Fred Again in the other two slots the festival would like to pursue more experienced targets, It seems Sam Fenders team would be prepared to consider a lessor slot on the farm but the festival team are drawn more towards him headline in 2027 or 2028. 

 

Bruce Springsteen content with his one headline appearance, has no plans to play again at this point. 

 

Little Simz sub headline slot was very positively received and the booking team are keen for her to be considered for a Pyramid Headline slot for a festival after the fallow year, though no formal talks have taken place.

 

IDLES after the other stage headline slot the festival booking team are keen to think a bit differently about how they size acts for stages - the local hero status of the band meaning they can perhaps take a larger slot than perhaps there current popularity suggests, however the festival team would prefer them to have headlined at Reading or Download prior to any serious consideration for a Pyramid headline slot. 

 

Kings Of Leon were a possibility of appearing last year however talks proved unfruitful and probably not likely to be seen at the festival again. 

 

Away from headliners at the festival the popularity of the Sugarbabes recent appearances has not gone unnoticed and the possibility of a regular Pop nostalgia slot has been discussed the key problems with this are about getting acts that are a consistent level of popularity likely to be trialed in 2025 with B*witched lined up to test. 

 

The answer to the question you have is 15,20,1,20,14,5,22,14,9

 

Haha so much bollocks here it's funny. It is quite obviously someone who frequents this forum and offers absolutely nothing that hasn't already been discussed and verified previously 🤣🤣

 

In fact has anyone asked an AI bot to read the forums and make a post?? Haha 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Skip997 said:

Exactly 

 

We could dig up plenty on a lot of those of have previously played 

 

“I can see that you’re  just fifteen years old

No I don’t want your I.D.”

The plethora of homophobic slurs from Stormzy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, foolee said:

 


Oh yeah I remember seeing this. Did anyone work out the cryptic code at the bottom in the end? 

Yes I may have! Thought it might correlate to letters of the alphabet. If you take the numbers as letters of the alphabet it spells OTSTNEVNI which is inventato backwards which is Italian for “invented”. 
 

coincidence or does it (probably) mean it’s all BS?

 

And do I win a prize for decoding it 🤣

  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if it was a legit piece of text the tone suggests that it could only have been written by someone in the Glastonbury office to someone outside of the inner circle who would be allowed to know such intricate details, but it is presented in a formal way, so its not a note to a friend or even someone the writer knows well. So perhaps it could be an update for someone at the BBC who had asked for an update. If so the numbers could be the answer to something like - ‘what radio frequencies are you planning to use for your mics so we don’t clash?’

 

but I don’t think it is legitimate because it has spelling mistakes and anyone writing such sensitive information would be very careful in their writing and re-read a few times.
 

Also if it was genuine surely you would remove the numbers at the bottom?

 

But on the other hand… 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

Yes I may have! Thought it might correlate to letters of the alphabet. If you take the numbers as letters of the alphabet it spells OTSTNEVNI which is inventato backwards which is Italian for “invented”. 
 

coincidence or does it (probably) mean it’s all BS?

 

And do I win a prize for decoding it 🤣

This is GENIUS!

 

100% this is a fake made by an Italian person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

Yes I may have! Thought it might correlate to letters of the alphabet. If you take the numbers as letters of the alphabet it spells OTSTNEVNI which is inventato backwards which is Italian for “invented”. 
 

coincidence or does it (probably) mean it’s all BS?

 

And do I win a prize for decoding it 🤣

 

No prize but I have given you an upvote! 👏🏻

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

6 hours ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

Yes I may have! Thought it might correlate to letters of the alphabet. If you take the numbers as letters of the alphabet it spells OTSTNEVNI which is inventato backwards which is Italian for “invented”. 
 

coincidence or does it (probably) mean it’s all BS?

 

And do I win a prize for decoding it 🤣

 

6 hours ago, Wildglastotheo said:

This is GENIUS!

 

100% this is a fake made by an Italian person.

 

Poirot has cracked the case with his little grey cells. A water-tight decoding.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Wildglastotheo said:

but I don’t think it is legitimate because it has spelling mistakes and anyone writing such sensitive information would be very careful in their writing and re-read a few times.


You’d be surprised. I regularly get legal documents from solicitors at work that are absolutely riddled with spelling errors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CantWaitForGlasto22 said:

Yes I may have! Thought it might correlate to letters of the alphabet. If you take the numbers as letters of the alphabet it spells OTSTNEVNI which is inventato backwards which is Italian for “invented”. 
 

coincidence or does it (probably) mean it’s all BS?

 

And do I win a prize for decoding it 🤣


Surely it’s INVENTSTO backwards? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...