Maybe yeah I can comment pre 2013 just what I’ve noticed in the last 10 years and the last 2 I’d say especially. Also coincided with it getting too busy which at least partially seems to be down to extra corporate tickets if what I read on here is right.
Maybe missing the point slightly there.
Compared to 2013? Yes, it is more commercial. For sure.
Compared to late 90s and the 00s? Much less so, and we were poking fun at the "back in my day" people who choose to forget that.
Starting with the 2010 festival, the Festival made a noticeable effort to get rid of a lot of the unnecessary brands that had found their way on site. Those places we namechecked earlier - none of them were made up, and that list was nowhere near exhaustive. But yeah, since the pandemic it's swung back in the other direction a fair bit.
But yes, all the available evidence backs up the feeling that Charli’s moment in the sun is very much a bubble thing, which doesn’t make for a sensible Glastonbury headliner (and might well be over by this summer anyway).
I love Glastonbury and have no strong opinions about what NY has said as we don’t and probably never will know the real reason, although broadcasting the whole show seems most likely if he objected to this before.
but those of you saying the festival hasn’t got more commercial over the years are kidding yourselves, I’ve noticed a massive change and have only been going since 2013, yes it’s still way less commercial than a Reading or APE but it’s there and noticeable all the time now. The final straw for me would be if they ever change their alcohol policy and try to limit what you can bring in, despite the fact I’m now at the stage where I buy most of my beer I think that would be such a fundamental change, anyway one for another thread. I probably wasn’t going to see NY anyway but I think it’s a shame. Let’s go and get Oasis 😉
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.