Jump to content

The KLF to Headline !!!!


Franky
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 7/23/2024 at 9:22 PM, paulshane said:

I 100% believe they burnt the cash

 

My mate did say that the bloke genuinely looked pissed off. However, that could all be part of the art.

 

On 7/23/2024 at 10:02 PM, faymondo said:

They deffo burned it. Still unsure as to why. My theory is that Drummond needed to just get back to "normal" whatever that is. The KLF turned into a music industry beast they were all against even if it was all on their own terms. 

 

Back in 2017 I went to a KLF event in Liverpool over three days. Big discussion on night one over the burning of the million.

 

Wrote a blog on it.

 

Days 1 & 2 https://wp.me/pzmxh-1il

 

Day 3 https://wp.me/pzmxh-334

 

I can't read those right now, but have made a note to read them in the near future. Reading in depth is difficult at this late hour. I shall also send copies to my mate, if that's OK with you? He'll be interested, I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

My mate did say that the bloke genuinely looked pissed off. However, that could all be part of the art.

 

I spoke with Mr Drummond at length a while back, in a turkish barbers in Stoke Newington, for a book signing, all very 'KLF' and while we didn't talk about the KLF era, as it wasn't the time or the place, everything he said and all the other anecdotes, just made me even more sure that burning the cash is just something they would have done, because they could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, paulshane said:

 

I spoke with Mr Drummond at length a while back, in a turkish barbers in Stoke Newington, for a book signing, all very 'KLF' and while we didn't talk about the KLF era, as it wasn't the time or the place, everything he said and all the other anecdotes, just made me even more sure that burning the cash is just something they would have done, because they could.

 

One of those 'seemed like a good idea at the time' moments. Mind you, there are those that can lose as much (and more) in a casino in a night's sitting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

One of those 'seemed like a good idea at the time' moments. Mind you, there are those that can lose as much (and more) in a casino in a night's sitting.

The difference is that the KLF didn't lose the money they knew where it was going. No money was burned only currency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

I'm having difficulty understanding your statement. Are you able to elaborate? I'm stoned and my mind is going off in all directions.

They essentially paid the government £1m in tax, the only value lost was the cost of reprinting the notes, a few hundred quid I would guess, irrelevant in the scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, gizmoman said:

They essentially paid the government £1m in tax, the only value lost was the cost of reprinting the notes, a few hundred quid I would guess, irrelevant in the scheme of things.

 

I hear what you are saying, and it makes much more sense. However, is there any proof of this eg a recognisable payment to HMRC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

I hear what you are saying, and it makes much more sense. However, is there any proof of this eg a recognisable payment to HMRC?

? no it wasn't a direct payment, it was like counterfeiting in reverse. They destroyed some currency, that reduced the amount of currency supply increasing the value for everyone else holding it. The government could then print and spend another £1m which would return the supply to what it was. It wouldn't make a noticeable difference to the real economy but the £1m wasn't lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, gizmoman said:

? no it wasn't a direct payment, it was like counterfeiting in reverse. They destroyed some currency, that reduced the amount of currency supply increasing the value for everyone else holding it. The government could then print and spend another £1m which would return the supply to what it was. It wouldn't make a noticeable difference to the real economy but the £1m wasn't lost.

 

I sort of get the 'quantitative easing' bit - a little , but surely the money (in paper form) would have been lost to them ie the KLF, but not so the economy as a whole?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

I sort of get the 'quantitative easing' bit - a little , but surely the money (in paper form) would have been lost to them ie the KLF, but not so the economy as a whole?

Yes, the value was transferred, most people would think the 'money' went up in smoke, but in fact the value was transferred, either to the government or to the wider economy however you wish to view it. I believe they did it to get people to question the nature of currency and think about how paper money is an illusion, it has no intrinsic value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, gizmoman said:

Yes, the value was transferred, most people would think the 'money' went up in smoke, but in fact the value was transferred, either to the government or to the wider economy however you wish to view it. I believe they did it to get people to question the nature of currency and think about how paper money is an illusion, it has no intrinsic value.

 

Paper money is indeed an illusion. It can also be counterfeited (nice long'ish story about this in link below. It's a great read in my opinion) which when added to quantitative easing allows for the dilution of paper money's value).

 

https://www.gq.com/story/the-great-paper-caper

 

I also think as we become more and more a cashless society that cryptocurrencies (especially Bitcoin) will be taken up by more people. I say this because a black market needs currency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yoghurt on a Stick said:

 

Paper money is indeed an illusion. It can also be counterfeited (nice long'ish story about this in link below. It's a great read in my opinion) which when added to quantitative easing allows for the dilution of paper money's value).

 

https://www.gq.com/story/the-great-paper-caper

 

I also think as we become more and more a cashless society that cryptocurrencies (especially Bitcoin) will be taken up by more people. I say this because a black market needs currency. 

Great story, wasn't aware of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, paulshane said:

 

I'm obsessed with the KLF and all the associated lunacy 😄

 

You don't say!

 

I don't really know much about them. In fact the knowledge that I have is right next to nothing. Not very far away from nothing, at all. However, the burning of the loot bit (the bit that I do know about) is of some interest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see it mentioned in this thread, but John Higgs' book on the KLF is superb if you even have the slightest interest in them. They definitely burned the money (some burned remains washed up on a beach) and I don't think they themselves really know why. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...