Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

UK Politics


kalifire

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

and yet the government still wouldn't dare go near it. 

Reckon it needs a bit more than one recent poll for the govt to be brave enough.

I think that poll might also signal that the rise of farage is starting to peter out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, lost said:

Seems a huge number for the south west, I've never really thought of it as having the infrastucture of other regions:

 

 

There's some bad housing problems in the south west with over 1000 street sleepers in Bristol alone. Also a lot of can't buy a house in the village I was brought up in.

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Neil said:

There's some bad housing problems in the south west with over 1000 street sleepers in Bristol alone.

 

I think it is just short of another Bristol. 40k a year over 5 year parliament, 2.3 average occupancy, I make that 472k. Google says Bristol is 483k.

Edited by lost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

They won't hit those targets...there will be massive push back from councils and nimbys etc. But, they might make some progress.

 

Yep. Just noticed how much green belt around Warrington is marked for development. From the people I know in Cheshire that is going to kick off big time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, lost said:

 

Yep. Just noticed how much green belt around Warrington is marked for development. From the people I know in Cheshire that is going to kick off big time.

also going to be a big push back from environmentalists (and from that yougov poll most people are environmentalists these days apparently)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

It’s fine to build the houses, but hii out will the roads cope with the additional traffic?

 

Thats what I thought about the south west. You would of thought the north and south east have much better infrastructure due to the north being the main area during the industrial revolution and the south east been the main area now.

 

its going to need massive road building in the South West.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

It’s fine to build the houses, but how will the roads cope with the additional traffic? where will people park in the village? Where will the kids in the new houses go to school and how will GP surgeries cope with extra people and no extra staff?

well...that's where planning comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, lost said:

 

Thats what I thought about the south west. You would of thought the north and south east have much better infrastructure due to the north being the main area during the industrial revolution and the south east been the main area now.

 

its going to need massive road building in the South West.

as soon as there is an issue on the M5 the entire SW grinds to a halt and its happened pretty frequently lately 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but I also just got this email from Cheshire wildlife trust...

Last month we told you of our efforts to protect Longridge, a Local Wildlife Site on the outskirts of Knutsford. 

Earlier this week we were devastated to learn that the housing development of 225 properties has been greenlit. This is despite it originally being rejected by the Local Planning Authority as inappropriate development in the greenbelt and as having unacceptable impacts on ecology.
 

Longridge Local Wildlife Site which lies on the outskirts of Knutsford and is a mosaic of oak woodland, wildflower grassland, scrub and ponds. It is a haven for wildlife with flocks of redwing, fieldfare and finches in the winter months and numerous red and amber listed breeding birds in summer including song thrush and willow warbler. Remarkably there are also three species of newt, which is extremely unusual for Cheshire.  
 

At a recent planning inquiry following an appeal against the initial rejection, Dr Rachel Giles, Evidence and Planning Programme Manager at Cheshire Wildlife Trust, gave evidence to defend the site. Several local residents also gave moving evidence on the importance of the site to the people of Longridge, including representatives from local groups Save Longridge Greenbelt and Knutsford Residents in Over Ward. 
 

Over the course of the two-week inquiry, the planning Inspector was presented with evidence for and against the housing development and subsequently decided in favour of it going ahead. 

 

think we're going to start seeing those pesky tree hugger swampy types doing their thing over the next few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...