Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

UK Politics


kalifire

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

that's just a temporary thing, right?

 

Don't think so It'll be anything the school chooses to buy going forward plus the article seems to suggest they can go back and claim anything from the last 10 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, lost said:

 

Don't think so It'll be anything the school chooses to buy going forward plus the article seems to suggest they can go back and claim anything from the last 10 years

If they haven't paid vat in those years how can they claim any back? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, lazyred said:

If they haven't paid vat in those years how can they claim any back? 

 

They will of paid VAT on anything they've bought from a VAT registered company so say a school bus or a builder turning over more than £90k

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, lost said:

 

They will of paid VAT on anything they've bought from a VAT registered company so say a school bus or a builder turning over more than £90k

Thanks I got it the wrong way round. Anyway I've just read the HMRC guidance and I still don't understand it but it looks like a mess with lots of loopholes

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/charging-and-reclaiming-vat-on-goods-and-services-related-to-private-school-fees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, lazyred said:

Thanks I got it the wrong way round. Anyway I've just read the HMRC guidance and I still don't understand it but it looks like a mess with lots of loopholes

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/charging-and-reclaiming-vat-on-goods-and-services-related-to-private-school-fees

VAT is like that though, right? Messy. UK Tax altogether is way too complicated, surely it could be simpler, maybe base it on the number of windows you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, lazyred said:

 I still don't understand it but it looks like a mess with lots of loopholes

 

 

I could be wrong but it read it as the following:
 

School A switches from charity to VAT registered company.

 

School A who's fees were 10k a year now charges 10k + VAT so 12k a year.

 

School A has 100 pupils so £1 million in fee's and 200k VAT to the tax man BUT

 

School A when it files its first tax return can claim back the VAT on anything its purchased in the last 10 years.

 

School A buys about £500k of stuff a year and has VAT receipts for about 5 million in purchases so 1 million pounds of VAT

 

HMRC rather than getting 200k owe the school £800k

Edited by lost
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do Tory government economic policies usually get this amount of scrutiny? 

I guess this is an issue Labour always was going to have, especially when things are so tight and with so many years of underinvestment and with silly promises made by Labour in opposition. The time between election and budget doesn't help either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2024 at 8:57 PM, LJS said:

 

by Neil, who was hardly an unbiased observer.

just sumarising what alex had said about himself. 😛 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for anyone in Bristol, be careful with your phone when out and about, snatches from your hands is becoming a thing in Bristol.

 

they don't want your phone they want to raid your bank account via your phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/13/2024 at 8:57 PM, LJS said:

 

by Neil, who was hardly an unbiased observer.

This wasn't just Neil. I've seen this reference all over the internet.

 

Here's another example of critiques of responses:

https://bsky.app/profile/youngvulgarian.bsky.social/post/3l6dr3udx7i2m

 

And to be clear, I don't think Salmond = sh*t means anyone supports independence is sh*t. I am actively rejecting the bullshit idea that we should only say nice things about someone because they're dead. He was an abusive c**t and the worst dregs of humanity and I'm not saying a single thing about him that I didn't say when he was alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kaosmark2 said:

This wasn't just Neil. I've seen this reference all over the internet.

 

Here's another example of critiques of responses:

https://bsky.app/profile/youngvulgarian.bsky.social/post/3l6dr3udx7i2m

 

And to be clear, I don't think Salmond = sh*t means anyone supports independence is sh*t. I am actively rejecting the bullshit idea that we should only say nice things about someone because they're dead. He was an abusive c**t and the worst dregs of humanity and I'm not saying a single thing about him that I didn't say when he was alive.

well, with that conclusive evidence he is obviously a serial rapist and the biggest c**t ever to have existed and may he burn in hell and we'll forget about all the other stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, steviewevie said:

well, with that conclusive evidence he is obviously a serial rapist and the biggest c**t ever to have existed and may he burn in hell and we'll forget about all the other stuff.

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/marie-le-conte-confronting-the-truth-about-alex-salmond/

 

The point is that the positive reactions are showing how neglected sexual assault and victims are. Again.

 

I've given you some paraphrased quotes and if you cared you'd follow up on them instead of make sarcastic comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, kaosmark2 said:

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/marie-le-conte-confronting-the-truth-about-alex-salmond/

 

The point is that the positive reactions are showing how neglected sexual assault and victims are. Again.

 

I've given you some paraphrased quotes and if you cared you'd follow up on them instead of make sarcastic comments.

ok...well...in the end he was not found guilty, there was a whole load of stuff about conspiracies against him from Sturgeon and others...but he was known as a bit too touchy feeling at best which he admitted, a sexual predator at worst which he denied.

So he had that, and also he had this political career where he took SNP from a fringe party to one of power and nearly took Scotland out of the union...which isn't nothing.

So, you can recognise his achievements without saying what a top fella he was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kaosmark2 said:

https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/marie-le-conte-confronting-the-truth-about-alex-salmond/

 

The point is that the positive reactions are showing how neglected sexual assault and victims are. Again.

 

I've given you some paraphrased quotes and if you cared you'd follow up on them instead of make sarcastic comments.

I've only skimmed it but it basically boils down to this bit?

 

Alex Salmond faced allegations of sexual assault and attempted rape, brought forward by multiple women. By the time the story broke, rumours about his behaviour had already been floating around British politics for many years. During the trial, his own defence described him as “touchy feely” and admitted that he would sometimes act inappropriately. In his closing speech, his QC said that his client “could certainly have been a better man”.
He wasn’t found guilty in the end but, to be very blunt, this does not mean he wasn’t guilty of horrific behaviour towards a string of women. It is possible that the truth will come out now he is gone and it is possible it will not.
 
Worst dregs of humanity is hyperbolic, and I've always thought he was a bit of a c un t
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, steviewevie said:

ok...well...in the end he was not found guilty, there was a whole load of stuff about conspiracies against him from Sturgeon and others...but he was known as a bit too touchy feeling at best which he admitted, a sexual predator at worst which he denied.

So he had that, and also he had this political career where he took SNP from a fringe party to one of power and nearly took Scotland out of the union...which isn't nothing.

So, you can recognise his achievements without saying what a top fella he was.

Also in his political career he pushed Russian propaganda, blood and soil nationalism, and perpetuated a politics of hate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...