No, he’s not simply making his choice. If he was simply making his choice we wouldn’t know about any of this. His statement WAS him behaving immaturely. If it wasn’t it wouldn’t exist or it would have read something like this.
I’d love to play Glastonbury, but I don’t want my full set to be on the bbc, I’d like to protect the specialness of a one off live event. But that is part of the deal that the festival wants. It’s a shame we can’t get to a place we all agree on, but I understand their view and they understand mine. I hope everyone has a great festival.
oh, and it’s not the bbc dictating content. It’s the festival upholding their broadcast agreement that they signed and presumably believe is more beneficial to them than a one off performance by NY.
Would be in keeping with what they did before Christmas tbf.
It is a genuine question as to who that third headliner is though. Somebody said that they're apparently booked and lined up but we're waiting for a proclamation. Would've been a surprise if it had just been whacked online as a New Year present tbf.
Well, the suspected theory is that the BBC HAVE dictated that unless Neil Young gives up his right to not have his whole set filmed with bits repeated whenever they like, he can't play the festival.
Whole sets haven't been televised live for decades. The last time Neil played they showed about 5 of his songs. That's his precedent. You'd think they'd have remembered that.
You've interpreted this as him behaving immaturely. He's saying he's simply making his choice.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.