benisright Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 I swear V was made for shitty bands like Arctic Monkeys, and just to clarify, muse shit all over am. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chappiepunk Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 after you opinions of late, i shall take nothing you say seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benisright Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 And im sure i said something like arctic monkeys would headline in 2009 back in well....2007! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Englishdragon Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 Why is everyone saying sc**thorpe all the time i live there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rexclark Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 They probably will headline. This is not necessarily a good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil-itfc Posted March 21, 2008 Report Share Posted March 21, 2008 DEFFO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Boots Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 haha i hope to god arctic monkeys dont what a pile of shit!! got OWNED 2006 by muse. poor band. and this thread is pointless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benisright Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Why is everyone saying sc**thorpe all the time i live there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TYLER_4 Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Muse are one of the most uninspiring bands I have ever seen. When teenagers find rock music, the first thing they listen to is Muse. That's all they are, that's the purpose they serve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 c**t??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TYLER_4 Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 im not trying to show bias. but there is only so much incompitance that you cna take!! how thick do you have to be to compare muse to busted or mcfly utter crap!!! oasis! more talented than muse !! what a load of crap they use the same chords in pretty much every song. atleast use decent bands in your analogy. radiohead are good, but live are no where near as intense. anyways my point is arctic monkeys arent a headline band , muse are this is proved by reading /leeds 06 if you were there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinback Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 honest though. bit like busted and mcfly! People always move on from loving muse, i inclube myself in that. In 10 years time they wont be headlinign festivals and they also wont be remembered for classic songs. If u ask non muse fans to name classic songs, they cant! Unlike real top bands lika oasis, manics, blur, radiohead. we all know u adore muse, buy ur username. but try not to use to much bias. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metallimuse Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 honest though. bit like busted and mcfly! People always move on from loving muse, i inclube myself in that. In 10 years time they wont be headlinign festivals and they also wont be remembered for classic songs. If u ask non muse fans to name classic songs, they cant! Unlike real top bands lika oasis, manics, blur, radiohead. we all know u adore muse, buy ur username. but try not to use to much bias. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 im not trying to show bias. but there is only so much incompitance that you cna take!! how thick do you have to be to compare muse to busted or mcfly utter crap!!! oasis! more talented than muse !! what a load of crap they use the same chords in pretty much every song. atleast use decent bands in your analogy. radiohead are good, but live are no where near as intense. anyways my point is arctic monkeys arent a headline band , muse are this is proved by reading /leeds 06 if you were there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TYLER_4 Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 (edited) ur a bit tetchy about muse arnt you. arctic monkeys are a headline band, as a are muse. I take you havnt been to see radiohead then if you think muse are more intense. radiohead glato 1997 was the most intense band ive ever seen. Ive never said muse are not amazing live, but they havnt got classic songs or songs which will go down as classics and they still have got to make a career defining album. also oasis are very talented, not as good a musician as matt bellamy i will give you that. Im no great big fan of oasis but come on there the band the defined a decade, muse wouldnt even get in the top 10 defining albums of this decade..No I never saw muse headline 2006, well done for loking at my sig But ive seen muse plenty of times from the very start, not just a fan of bands when they get massive Edited March 22, 2008 by muse forever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 hmmm alryt i'll let you off!! you have valid grounds for comment!! but it does annoy me when 'in my opinion' people underestimate muse, saying that selling out wembley twice is an impressive achivement for someone who cnt get in the top 10 and i agree i normally lose interest in bands when media hype surrounds them but im just taken away by bellamy a genius. anyways sorry for snappin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinback Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 no worries mate..i was only on the i wind up. nad my bitterness watching skunk anansie who muse supported inthe early days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dakyras Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Arctic Monkeys are poo. IMO of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannypal Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 (edited) hopefully they will headline next year, theres been so good headliners for a few years now, razorlight being the all time worst (well i assume i didnt see them) and AM totally blew away muse in 2006. Muse were once a great band, but they have lost it now, the first 2 or 3 albums were pretty good but the new one seems like they are just writing total shite, they are kinda trying to be weird for the sake of it. AM are more original and fun Edited March 22, 2008 by dannypal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza_20 Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Bravo on making a guess which is fairly obvious. Ive got 2 of the 3 headliners for 2009 in my head already (guesses obviously, im not claiming to know, since Melvin Benn won't even know yet) FRI: LostProphets (New Album out by then, headlining Download.. natural progression would see them headline Reading) SAT: Arctic Monkeys (Maybe... depends on how long the Last Shadow Puppets thing lasts... We could well see TLSP headlining the NME tent instead) SUN: Anyones guess... Green Day? Foos? Guns n Roses? The Verve? Could be anyone at this point really, as could the Friday, and Saturday but they would be my early guesses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 hopefully they will headline next year, theres been so good headliners for a few years now, razorlight being the all time worst (well i assume i didnt see them) and AM totally blew away muse in 2006. Muse were once a great band, but they have lost it now, the first 2 or 3 albums were pretty good but the new one seems like they are just writing total shite, they are kinda trying to be weird for the sake of it. AM are more original and fun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannypal Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Im mates with loads of muse fans and they all agree with me. I like muse i would go see them, just to hear the old stuff. In fact i have seen them live on the absolution tour and they were pretty good then, they have just gone down hill from there, with all the dancing robots and shite, they need to get back to good music Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TYLER_4 Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 Im mates with loads of muse fans and they all agree with me. I like muse i would go see them, just to hear the old stuff. In fact i have seen them live on the absolution tour and they were pretty good then, they have just gone down hill from there, with all the dancing robots and shite, they need to get back to good music Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newagehippie Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 They are shit, they were terrible before muse the other year! if they headline MF will need some great other acts to get me there for my 8th year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benisright Posted March 22, 2008 Report Share Posted March 22, 2008 They are shit, they were terrible before muse the other year! if they headline MF will need some great other acts to get me there for my 8th year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.