benisright Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 (edited) try not to take it all so personally and get upset about it mate. Bruce is ok, sure, but there are many many artists that tower over him. Nick Cave being just a single example. It's ok though, if you like him then cool. Edited March 3, 2009 by benisright Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russycarps Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I think Springsteen is one of the highest regarded lyricists in history...no ones said hes the best, just hes up there. By highest regarded? I mean the guardian placed Springsteen in the top 5 last year, the bbc produced a show dedicated to his lyrical quality. Your opinion is different, fair enough. Just try not to present objective opinion as fact. Your putting things in perspective by telling us that some nobody (you) has a different opinion and thinks Nick Cave is a much better lyricist and we should all start to follow that opinion. "im not crazy, its everyone else thats nuts" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benisright Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Find me the quote...go on...where it says bruce springsteen is definitely the best lyricist in the world without question and that anyone who disagrees is an idiot. Because the only reference i can find to a definitive view on lyrical quality is from you, when you say Springsteen definitely isnt the best lyricist and that thats a fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens Wildman Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 just putting things in perspective, champ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sifi Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 "no ones said hes the best" errr have you read this thread??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benisright Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I'm sure I've read people write that previously, if not in this one then in one of the other twenty Bruce threads that have been created ad nauseam. It was decided that he didn't write "Like and a Rolling Stone" and as such wasn't Bob Dylan and therefore couldn't be the greatest songwriter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sifi Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 you wouldn't let it lie, would you? it's all about the performance sifi something Bob fans aren't too fussed about, apparently Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nal Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 I've just got this email from Glasto perennial camping supplier favourites Millets .... In keeping with the general theme of the festival this year and specifically inspired by the much mooted Saturday night slot by Bruce Springsteen, Millets, the nationwide camping equipment supplier, will be returning to Glatonbury with a special range of new items for 2009. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russycarps Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Nick Cave's ok, if you like all that cartoon-ish 'look at me, I'm playing with the devil, I'm really really baaaaad' stuff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens Wildman Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 (edited) huh well I don't see Bruce Sprinsteen doing any duets with KYLIE MINOGUE so there! Edited March 3, 2009 by Jens Wildman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens Wildman Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 (edited) Got some of this stuff myself. "Prove it all Night" multi packs of viagra. "Lost in the Flood" rubber dinghys. "Tunnel of Love" lubrication. ....and my personal favourite Clarence "Big Man" Clemons condoms. Thay have a picture of the Clarence and have a golden sax on the tip. Feel free to shout "DO I HAVE TO SAY HIS NAME?" before putting them on. All for about 50 quid! Edited March 3, 2009 by Jens Wildman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sifi Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 it's all about the performance sifi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens Wildman Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 (edited) I've just got this e-mail sent to me from the future .... Mysterious Glasto Absence explained (Reuters, 3rd July 2009) Speculation is growing.. Edited March 3, 2009 by Jens Wildman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam. Posted March 3, 2009 Report Share Posted March 3, 2009 Eavis gave a press conference at the nme awards last night where he said that Bruce is getting 2 1/2 hours for his set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRW Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 Its taken me three days to plough my way through this. These are my opinions:- 1)2.5h is too long a set for one artist - regardless of stature. 2) Some people love BS a little too much. 3) You will never win an argument on eFestivals. An intertesting (or not) side note is that I am as big a fan of Neil Young, as some of the people on here are of BS. And I for one would not want NY bigged up as much as BS has been. This is because i know, no matter how much I love NY, I know i could never convince people of the same. Music is subjective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveinafield Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 i recall roger waters getting a long slot early evening....can anyone recall how long he got? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sifi Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 (edited) a Bruce performance is not ALL about the songs... of course, this might go a long way to explaining why you're not that big a fan...?? Edited March 4, 2009 by sifimaster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens Wildman Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 (edited) don't have the same depth for me Anyhow, I'm all Bruced out. Edited March 4, 2009 by Jens Wildman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joelovesleeds! Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 I think two and a half hours it too much for anyone. This has put me off the idea a bit, I'm not a massive fan but thought I'd watch to see what the fuss is all about, but a two and a half hour set is too much. I know what the seemingly obvious answer is- only watch some of the set, but I dont think that gives a full account of someone, and there's no guarentee I'll see the songs I'd like to the most. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sifi Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 Well, dont read the threads then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens Wildman Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 (edited) Gee, thanks Tips. Edited March 4, 2009 by Jens Wildman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.