Sam being in a non headline spot means nothing as Coachella books a lot of crap to headline that won't either. You really need to get over this narrative that Coachella sets the standard for where a band universally can't go lower than. It's really not a case of....they topped it in America so they will here. There are various artists around 24, 23, 19, 16 and 15 that would not headline Glastonbury.
No need for apologies, the ticket has to be justified to you. I wouldn't get there at late as Thursday evening myself.
This doesn't even put Green Day in the conversation and it won't be Sabrina.
There is potential here but MCR could just do stadium shows, I don't think them and LP play. I think Rob Zombie is likely there on the second year round. I'd firstly see no reason to book Evanescence in that spot, switch with Architects.
Likely this.
I think there's absolutely no chance you're getting that.
I don't think you'll get A7X again soon and SOAD I think is unlikely. I think there was a prime option for them to come over this year with festivals doing anniversary shows they have played before and theg haven't. Slipknot once more is likely too.
Download 2.0 means nothing really. But none of those bands you mention there should be in massive slots. Bullet last headlined 2000 trees and that's 3rd down Download at max. Skindred played it too and they get 3rd down off of name. Soft Play headlined Trees. Don Broco who have did bigger tours than Bullet without needing one of those big 'co-headline' things. In my opinion, a big crowd at a festival isn't the only relative point to where they should be...some people are actually holding off on tours actively expecting a band at a festival and Download is kinda predictable.
I was out last night at a pub gig and they covered year 3000, my first thought was how do this sound anything like McFly?! I personally think they are a dreadful booking. They covered Wheatus too. Busted and McFly are mates, that's as close as it comes to being relative.
Recommended Posts