Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Tuition Fees March


Guest sifi

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Are you really advocating violence, Neil?

I was merely pointing out that it took Ghandi something like 40 years to achieve his aims. And of course, unlike with for-or-against spending cuts, he had 'right' absolutely on his side.

It's not anything meaningful to throw into this conversation, that's for sure.

As for 'violence', it depends on what you're meaning. Yesterday wasn't violence at any meaningful level from what I've seen of it - the only thing that could class as that (that I've heard of, anyway) was the fire extinguisher being thrown from the roof, but I'd put that down to an individual dickhead.

It sounds like Dave Moron has realised what might be coming tho, with his praise of the old bill. Got to keep the troops on side, eh? - tho that might prove more difficult than he's thinking once the cuts for the old bill get announced. Here's betting that the govt find some way to absolve the Met from the same level of cuts as other forces get. Thatcher knew what was what - she cut the old bill a fantastic pay deal (which they're still getting) to buy them to her side in an age of similar disruption. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was merely pointing out that it took Ghandi something like 40 years to achieve his aims. And of course, unlike with for-or-against spending cuts, he had 'right' absolutely on his side.

It's not anything meaningful to throw into this conversation, that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed, and he had a world war to use as a chip too.

Yep - and another nationalist leader (I forget his name) who has just about been written out of Indian history who WAS using violence.

Ghandhi's success is actually very strongly linked to that other violent campaign - he was chosen by the Brits as someone they could do business with as a way to marginalise the more radical alternative.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep - and another nationalist leader (I forget his name) who has just about been written out of Indian history who WAS using violence.

Ghandhi's success is actually very strongly linked to that other violent campaign - he was chosen by the Brits as someone they could do business with as a way to marginalise the more radical alternative.

Edited by jump
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was he the other guy the one that ran the Quit India Movement?

I've no idea TBH - I know little about him, aside from his existence. I know there was a statue put up to him somewhere (I presume Delhi) around the time of independence, and that it was taken down again a few years after as the Gandhi myth became the default version of Indian history.

I know of him via the late actor Kenneth Griffith (probably most famous to younger generations as the gay Welsh doctor in 'The Wild Geese', or the vicar in 'The Man Who Went Up A Hill And Came Down A Mountain', or for his cameo in 'Four Weddings And A Funeral', but who was Peter Sellers' sidekick in all of his early UK films) who I knew - he was my son's cousin's grandfather - who had an interest in weird aspects of British history overseas (India, South Africa, & Ireland mainly, as far as I know).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the main difference between change being brough about by either peaceful means or violent ones, is that a peaceful change will be more likely to last. Violence is just bullying in the end.

Yesterdays violence is not how most of the protestors wanted the day to be remembered for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the main difference between change being brough about by either peaceful means or violent ones, is that a peaceful change will be more likely to last. Violence is just bullying in the end.

I strongly disagree (tho as a general comment, not necessarily strictly applicable in this case).

Often violence is the only answer, particularly when violence is being used to maintain 'a wrong' - such as at points in the troubles in N.I., or with the Zimbabwe independence movement, or South Africa's anti-apartheid movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...