Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Do you smoke?


Guest Jackmypie

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 341
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They aren't methodological frameworks for the person, they're methodological frameworks for the relationship between therapist and client.

If they say that they are over smoking yet they smoke, then they are in denial. If they give you credit for them quitting, then they're transferring. If they keep smoking because they say they can't cope, then they're regressing.

You can't deny the relationship and what the person is saying to both you and themselves. They may be rational, but they'll lie to themselves to get around themselves - especially if they're addicted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's often the case though. Denial is immense as are all of the other defense mechanisms. We identify with them because we perceive them as part of our personality as distinct from reality. In fact, there's no avoiding them as we are not privy to an objective world. We'd be like the Visitors from V without them (sci-fi reference for you).

I actually admire Skinner more than the other behaviourists. The age of behaviourism in the human sciences is over though, as CBT testifies. It's used in the computer sciences more han anything else now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You see, to believe that is to realise something intellectually. You don't realise it physiologically do you. We aren't the body, but the experience of the body. The body tends not to deny itself, unlike ourselves.

Edited by feral chile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as you know I believe the brain produces this experience of ourselves. I think somehow our brain draws all our sensory data together and combines it so it makes sense. And the way it does that is by separating the 'I' from the experience. So there isn't just red, there's a me who sees the red.

Which might be necessary on an evolutionary level - if you couldn't distance yourself from the experience, you'd have no mechanism for removing yourself from danger - you'd just be, no matter whether being was pain. Or destruction.

Edited by worm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 'I' being a series of defense mechanisms at any given time often completely oblivious to the everyday danger posed by mortality. What about people who self-sacrifice? Are we going down the Dawkins route of doing it for the benefit of genetic survival?

It's all about narrative to me. We fit our idealisations and experiences into a pre-existing cultural narrative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is such thing as physical addiction. A physical addiction will create an entire set of physical symptoms in withdrawal. For alcohol and benzodiazipines (this includes valium), this physical withdrawal can be severe enough to causing fits and death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is such thing as physical addiction. A physical addiction will create an entire set of physical symptoms in withdrawal. For alcohol and benzodiazipines (this includes valium), this physical withdrawal can be severe enough to causing fits and death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...