Mouseboy11 Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 probably because they have been doing the same show for 10 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Been playing that same set list over 4 new albums, Yeah ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouseboy11 Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 didnt say same setlist did I? few lazers and big balloons and everyone creams themself over muse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gazza_20 Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Someone on the official boards claims to know that they are, while I've had some info which indicates that they might be. As far as I'm concerned from what I know, currently they might be or might not be, tho each thing tends to make the likelihood stronger. While both are similarl;y marked as 'strong rumours' in the efests line-ups, I've got far more solid info which suggests that Kasabian are a headliner than I have for the cure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Suggesting they are a "tight" band has nothing to do with a few lazers and balloons, it's about how well they play musically. I think they are an amazing live act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacky Boy Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Muse are decent live, and I really enjoyed them at Reading last year as I got to hear one of my favourite albums of all time played live, but they're nothing compared to how they were 8 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Muse are decent live, and I really enjoyed them at Reading last year as I got to hear one of my favourite albums of all time played live, but they're nothing compared to how they were 8 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRichards23 Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 The Cure, Kasabian and Foo Fighters looks a bit more likely now then it seems, i'd hope Latitude had The Cure instead of R&L but you can't pick and choose the line ups ourselves, although that would be interesting. Just hope someone like Avenged Sevenfold, Enter Shikari or Lostprophets headline the NME to clash with The Cure, that'll suit me down to the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonodillieono Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Matt bellamy is talented, but chris and dom? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dip Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Muse are really good live the first time you see them. See them more than once and you realise they're churning out the same show time and time again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rivalschools.price Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 The Cure, Kasabian and Foo Fighters looks a bit more likely now then it seems, i'd hope Latitude had The Cure instead of R&L but you can't pick and choose the line ups ourselves, although that would be interesting. Just hope someone like Avenged Sevenfold, Enter Shikari or Lostprophets headline the NME to clash with The Cure, that'll suit me down to the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouseboy11 Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 I'm hoping for Chase and status on the Cure night, don't want them to clash with the other headliners who i'd like to see. I've seen them both before so may not go to Kasabian depending on who's on the NME but the Foo's are phenomenal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stylishkids Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Have people actually given The Cure a good listen if they didn't know who they were? If I didn't know a band of a similar status of them and it looked like they were going to be headlining a festival I was going to I'd be making sure I gave them a very good listen to see whether I actually thought they were any good or not. Especially considering the lack of other bands who are been thrown up as rumours and considering people don't know who the alternative will be on the NME etc. And I mean a good listen. Ie 4/5 listens of one of their albums, not 'I'll check out 2/3 tracks on youtube once and base my whole opinion on the band on them'. For a start you won't even know if they are a band who grow on you on continuous listens. I'm amazed that some people are given the opportunity to see a band with the critical standing of that of The Cure's and their immediate thought is 'give me 'this band' or 'this band'' who I've seen plenty of times and can do again in the future. Do people have no desire to find and listen to new music? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieSpenno Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 The Cure, Kasabian and Foo Fighters looks a bit more likely now then it seems, i'd hope Latitude had The Cure instead of R&L but you can't pick and choose the line ups ourselves, although that would be interesting. Just hope someone like Avenged Sevenfold, Enter Shikari or Lostprophets headline the NME to clash with The Cure, that'll suit me down to the ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mouseboy11 Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Any chance of Bullet playing? Them or A7X would be nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vacant0 Posted February 7, 2012 Report Share Posted February 7, 2012 Have people actually given The Cure a good listen if they didn't know who they were? If I didn't know a band of a similar status of them and it looked like they were going to be headlining a festival I was going to I'd be making sure I gave them a very good listen to see whether I actually thought they were any good or not. Especially considering the lack of other bands who are been thrown up as rumours and considering people don't know who the alternative will be on the NME etc. And I mean a good listen. Ie 4/5 listens of one of their albums, not 'I'll check out 2/3 tracks on youtube once and base my whole opinion on the band on them'. For a start you won't even know if they are a band who grow on you on continuous listens. I'm amazed that some people are given the opportunity to see a band with the critical standing of that of The Cure's and their immediate thought is 'give me 'this band' or 'this band'' who I've seen plenty of times and can do again in the future. Do people have no desire to find and listen to new music? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashrichards Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Takes more than a few light and big balloons like muse to be good live you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieuphoria Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 People like Avenged Sevenfold? Jesus christ what is wrong with you all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRichards23 Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 People like Avenged Sevenfold? Jesus christ what is wrong with you all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vieuphoria Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Always thought they were regarded as a joke. Always saw them as the metal equivalent of a boyband. It's all so contrived. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingo Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Think A7X said they weren't touring this year or not playing festivals or something to that effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beau1 Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Have people actually given The Cure a good listen if they didn't know who they were? If I didn't know a band of a similar status of them and it looked like they were going to be headlining a festival I was going to I'd be making sure I gave them a very good listen to see whether I actually thought they were any good or not. Especially considering the lack of other bands who are been thrown up as rumours and considering people don't know who the alternative will be on the NME etc. And I mean a good listen. Ie 4/5 listens of one of their albums, not 'I'll check out 2/3 tracks on youtube once and base my whole opinion on the band on them'. For a start you won't even know if they are a band who grow on you on continuous listens. I'm amazed that some people are given the opportunity to see a band with the critical standing of that of The Cure's and their immediate thought is 'give me 'this band' or 'this band'' who I've seen plenty of times and can do again in the future. Do people have no desire to find and listen to new music? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingo Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 I'm wondering that too, guranteed that if people actually listened to them then a lot of those moaning would probably enjoy 'The Head on the Door', 'Kiss Me, Kiss Me, Kiss me' and especially 'Wish' as its Rock and guitar orientated. A lot of people are, I imagine basing their opinions off pop songs like Boys Don't Cry, which in itself is a tiny part of what The Cure do. They are pretty much impossible to place into a genre, another thing that quite a lot people don't realise if they just hear the pop songs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beau1 Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 I know i'm not one complaining about it but I have given them a very good listen to and they just dont really do it for me but I can definitely appreciate the talent behind it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banana Co Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Have people actually given The Cure a good listen if they didn't know who they were? If I didn't know a band of a similar status of them and it looked like they were going to be headlining a festival I was going to I'd be making sure I gave them a very good listen to see whether I actually thought they were any good or not. Especially considering the lack of other bands who are been thrown up as rumours and considering people don't know who the alternative will be on the NME etc. And I mean a good listen. Ie 4/5 listens of one of their albums, not 'I'll check out 2/3 tracks on youtube once and base my whole opinion on the band on them'. For a start you won't even know if they are a band who grow on you on continuous listens. I'm amazed that some people are given the opportunity to see a band with the critical standing of that of The Cure's and their immediate thought is 'give me 'this band' or 'this band'' who I've seen plenty of times and can do again in the future. Do people have no desire to find and listen to new music? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.2f714abc79169eba870cbdd0b0135e98.jpg)
Recommended Posts