Edwina Curry

[russycarps]

Did anyone see that program the other night with the loathesome Edwina Curry trying to make a poor person look stupid? Hateful stuff.

[Bisque]

Hateful stuff.

[russycarps]

The follow up on that awful One Show on BBC1 was even worse. The person selected for the interview was chosen to be one who has had a poor education and struggles to artculate themselves.

These interviews are designed and fashioned to produce a reaction amongst middle-class fuckwits commuting to a horrible job that they despise, It is meant to create anger and meant to create a lack of sympathy and empathy for poor people. It is meant to divide us.

I wish it had been me that had been interviewed by la-dee-da priviledged Oxbridge Edwina looking to sneer at the poor. The arsehole tearing would have been reversed. I have the capability to answer back.

I would have started by asking her how she thought she had the right to lecture anybody on the subject of morality when her filthy deeds are common and public knowledge.

I would then have asked her whether she thought that people on benefits should feed their children British eggs, which are cheap and healthy and nutritious. Aren't they Edwina? Eh? EH?

Fuckin' toffee nosed, thatcherite. marie antoinette, celebrity politician's wife.

By now, I expect all those half-wit TV managers would be frantically pounding the advert button on their laptops to cut off any more truths and hide Edwina's tears as she suddenly becomes self-conscious and realises the foul monster of a human being that she has become.

[eFestivals]

Big fan of eggs I believe...

what, trying to get her own fertilised by a soon-to-be Prime Minister?

[rexclark]

A horrible c**t of a woman.

[Ed209]

A horrible c**t of a woman.

[lost]

I heard her on the Stephen Nolan with the same debate going on and though its a stupid comment I was also suprised by the comments from some of the crowd... Sky tv and a mobile phone being basic necessities, or to get a job you must have a car..

[Kowalski]

Did anyone see that program the other night with the loathesome Edwina Curry trying to make a poor person look stupid? Hateful stuff.

[russycarps]

The spelling of her surname seems to have made you look stupid.

[sifi]

Because it's Currie?

Doesn't detract from the fact that she's pretty hateful.

[russycarps]

Because it's Currie?

Doesn't detract from the fact that she's pretty hateful.

[sifi]

ah right. I'm quite pleased I've got it wrong actually, it reflects my lack of respect for her

[russycarps]

gah I'm starving now

[Yoghurt on a Stick]

Psychopathy (/saɪˈkɒpəθi/^[1][2]) is a mental disorder characterized primarily by a lack of empathy and remorse, shallow emotions, egocentricity, and deceptiveness.

That seems to sum her up as far as I'm concerned but must admit rexclark's description is far better and to the point.

[eFestivals]

Psychopathy (/saɪˈkɒpəθi/^[1][2]) is a mental disorder characterized primarily by a lack of empathy and remorse, shallow emotions, egocentricity, and deceptiveness.

That seems to sum her up as far as I'm concerned but must admit rexclark's description is far better and to the point.

Thing is, who got to decide it's a "dis" and on what basis, rather than it being something as normal to humans as not being psychopathic? In much the same way that being gay is normal.

The whole basis for such ideas is bollocks, and only exists for some people to exercise power other others.

[Yoghurt on a Stick]

"The whole basis for such ideas is bollocks, and only exists for some people to exercise power other others"

It possibly is (over others). I was just trying to say she's a callous, heartless, slut. Maybe I should have just said that in the first place! Or would that be me trying to exercise power unduly?

[sifi]

Are you saying the genetic mutation which makes some people homosexuals is the norm, and there it is in fact a mutation the other way?

[eFestivals]

I was just trying to say she's a callous, heartless, slut. Maybe I should have just said that in the first place!

yep, always say what you really mean.

[russycarps]

Are you saying the genetic mutation which makes some people homosexuals is the norm, and there it is in fact a mutation the other way?

[sifi]

Hang on, are you suggesting homosexuals are some kind of mutants? that they are freaks of nature? that they go against the very will of God Himself?

worse than jerry sadowitz you lad

[eFestivals]

Are you saying the genetic mutation which makes some people homosexuals is the norm, and there it is in fact a mutation the other way?

If there is such thing as a different gene that causes homosexuality, it's no less normal than the different gene that causes hetrosexuality.

Genes cause people to have different coloured eyes. That difference isn't considered a genetic fault, it's merely a genetic difference, that makes each type no less human than the other.

[Yoghurt on a Stick]

What about Noel Edmunds. You can't tell me he's not a genetic mutant!

[sifi]

If there is such thing as a different gene that causes homosexuality, it's no less normal than the different gene that causes hetrosexuality.

Genes cause people to have different coloured eyes. That difference isn't considered a genetic fault, it's merely a genetic difference, that makes each type no less human than the other.

[russycarps]

My feeling is that because the basis of life is pro-creation, that is to continue the existence of your species, then the mutation - if there is one - would naturally occur away from that which would ensure the continuation of the species.

[sifi]

which brings us nicely back to your red-haired people comment...

For what it's worth I dont believe your point is homophobic, but it is certainly something that is used by homophobic people when trying to explain why being homosexual is "wrong" and "unnatural"