Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

girls attacking girl, boyfriend attacking girls


Guest russycarps

Recommended Posts

check this out, scroll to the bottom and view the video. I dont care about the daily mail racist angle or any of that crap. Link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2070562/Muslim-girl-gang-kicked-Rhea-Page-head-yelling-kill-white-slag-FREED.html

Imagine if you were the guy and that was your girlfriend? You'd have to start lamping the girls wouldnt you? How would you play it? Ducking and weaving with clinical punches to the face to try and put them down fast? Putting eye of the tiger on your phone on loudspeaker and using their tits like a punch ball? Jonny Wilkinson style measured run up and kick square in the clout? Or get involved in a real scrappy brawl, tearing at their clothes (and your own), rolling around on the pavement shedding clothes steadily.

Its a tough one.

Edited by russycarps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh but if you had floored them you would have a difficult time living with yourself afterwards. I know you'd have to do it, but still. I cant quite imagine punching a girl in the face as hard as I could, no matter what. I would though.

Yes I found that comment odd too. I think he was rather restrained actually (no doubt being totally wasted didnt help)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt being totally wasted didnt help

it defo looks like he's wasted.

That, the way they go for specifically her but not him, and one of the quoted comments from the victim ("If they were not supposed to be drinking then they shouldn't have been out in bars at that time of night"), suggest to me that there might be more to the whole thing than is laid out within the Hate Mail's article.

Was the victim completely blameless? Or was there something she did in the bar where the text suggests she'd seen the attackers previously that led them to attack her?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it defo looks like he's wasted.

That, the way they go for specifically her but not him, and one of the quoted comments from the victim ("If they were not supposed to be drinking then they shouldn't have been out in bars at that time of night"), suggest to me that there might be more to the whole thing than is laid out within the Hate Mail's article.

Was the victim completely blameless? Or was there something she did in the bar where the text suggests she'd seen the attackers previously that led them to attack her?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For your sanity, dont read the comments...

which of course made me go back and read them. :lol:

It's all what you'd expect from the Hate Mail.

I decided to leave one too, but finished it off with something like "yeah, I know you bunch of racists won't publish this. You don't do the truth".

"The truth" included how they love to bang on about 'broken Britain', while their owner helps break Britain by being a tax exile - and outside the rules with being a tax exile, which makes him no less of a thief than anyone who mugs your grannie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he was restrained. Maybe a little too restrained. I have no idea how hammered he was but he seems to just stand and watch for a little bit. I would go for the "grab them and throw them as far as I could" technique, and then get the hell out of there. Its moments like that when I would wish I was clued up with some martial art so you could easily disable them. I dream of a situation where I'm Miyagi protecting my Daniel san against skeleton suited nutters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because I don't trust that Mail article to be the whole truth, I've googled the victim's name to see if there's any further details out there. I can only find 4 versions....

1. that Mail version.

2. a Telegraph version, which has identical quotes but none of the racist overtones - and which strikes me as a re-write of the Mail version.

3. a version on German website, which quotes the Mail word for word.

4. guess what? A link to the Mail version on Stormfront. :lol:

Here's betting that when the not-daily Leicester papers come out there's something more to it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Years age my ex wife got in a bit of a fight with another lass. I pulled them apart and we moved on. However guess who got arrested for assault later on? The lass really spun a yarn to the old bill and it was only witnesses that got me out after about 8 hours in the cells on the other side of the city where I lived. Should have let the bitch get her head kicked in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically... They where just the victims.... As the video shows...

I've not disputed that the girl was the victim of an attack. :rolleyes:

What I've done is highlighted that everything around the attack is not exactly as stated by the Daily Mail, that there's more to the story and that there might have been some sort of provocation which led to the attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dosen't really stand put to a common sense evaluation does it though... CPS didn't think it was a correct allegation and why would they attack her for something he said ? They went straight for her not him.

What the CPS might think says nothing of what the truth is. :rolleyes:

As for that 'why?', who knows? You don't, and nor do I - and the Mail doesn't say either, but it attempts to make you think it was for a particular reason, a reason that is - from what I found - disputed.

I simply said that there's probably more to the whole thing than the Mail presented - and i've proved that's the case.

There might be more to it than is given in that other article I found too. I don't know and neither do you.

Anyway, I am sure you will fight the good fight for every minority issue... :) Maybe this is just a case of four racist thugs beating up a young women and her boyfriend trying to protect (did a shit job I must say)...

Yep, it might be.

That would make it the same thing as happens more than daily with the races reversed, but which doesn't get splashed over the papers in the same way, and neither does it label the whites involved as Christians on the few occasions such things do make the papers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To guess the victim provoked it is more than unfair.

I didn't "guess the victim provoked it". :rolleyes:

I said that she might have done. It's within the possibles.

If she had, that still doesn't make what happened any more justifiable, but it does make it more understandable.

It helps me understand why the attackers went specifically for her and not her boyfriend too - after all, if it was a (just) racially motivated attack they'd surely have attacked both of the whites and not one of them.

It helps me understand why the victim said the attackers had been "drinking in bars" and not just "drinking". That subtle difference implies that the victim might have seen her attackers at some point earlier in the evening, and that there might be something from that previous sight which related to the attack.

FFS, with the straightforwards take you have on a clearly racially motivated report like that it's no wonder that you're as you are. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...