Last night was a bit of a Blur

[jump]

Wembley would be half the price of a Reading day ticket though.

[mrtourette]

Its clearly because Reading is such a horrible place to watch bands full of violent little oiks, that the only reason anyone would want to go to watch a band play the festival is if there was no other choice in England.

[zahidf]

Is that fact or opinion?

[mrtourette]

In that case I think he could still go with Blur as a 'festival exclusive' as Live in London wouldn't technically be a festival, and would they even be headlining that? MCR did the Radio One Big Weekend last year, yet they were still apparently an 'exclusive headliner' at R+L.

[harderfaster]

Wembley would be half the price of a Reading day ticket though.

[brettredmayne]

So are you ruling blur out of headlining if you still think they doing London Live?

[Bisque]

I don't see them playing two big outdoor events, so close together time & distance wise. Blur fans would just buy the London tickets out of travel convenience, cost & perhaps even having somewhere to stay after (though I imagine hotel prices around then will be ridiculous).

[RichieParf]

Blur and Oasis to co-headline reading 2013 - You heard it here first

Edited January 12, 2012 by RichieParf

[purplehaze81]

Alleged to be recording again this month... fuel to the fire?

[jump]

Source?

[purplehaze81]

Excellent, not seen that. I'll have a look now.

[Banana Co]

The difference between Oasis and Blur is Blur evolved and tried new styles whereas Oasis just churned out the same sub standard turgid shite for years and the only people that lapped it up were morons.

[Gingo]

Plus: Damon Albarn can sing.

Edited January 29, 2012 by Gingo

[Al2006]

This is a moot argument because Oasis turned out to be the bigger band, whether Blur or Oasis were better is frankly ridiculous because Oasis took Blur to the cleaners, but it just shows that Beady Eye are touring academys and Noel Gallagher is selling out arenas in minutes who was the talent in Oasis

[Gingo]

What a fucking stupid argument, and Katy Perry and Justin Bieber are selling even more, it doesn't mean ANYTHING in terms of talent, Blur are a way more interesting band than Oasis are, and going beyond that, what an amazing act Gorillaz are, you can't say Beady Eye or Noel Gallaghers birds in the sky (lol) are as good as Gorillaz? They just did what they know, play simple chords and TRY and create a catchy chavvy melody - pathetic.

[purplehaze81]

I think you misunderstood what i was saying, my argument was agreeing that Liam Gallagher was a poorer singer and by saying Noel Gallagher was selling out arenas even though he wasnt the front man of Oasis it is obvious he was the better talent, my only argument against Blur was that they turned out to be less popular than Oasis so in the end it didnt really matter who was better or not, each have their own fans

[Banana Co]

What a fucking stupid argument, and Katy Perry and Justin Bieber are selling even more, it doesn't mean ANYTHING in terms of talent, Blur are a way more interesting band than Oasis are, and going beyond that, what an amazing act Gorillaz are, you can't say Beady Eye or Noel Gallaghers birds in the sky (lol) are as good as Gorillaz? They just did what they know, play simple chords and TRY and create a catchy chavvy melody - pathetic.