Ed209 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 6 of the last 7 goals Sweden have conceded have come from headers. Makes sense to put the big man up front. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strummer77 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 6 of the last 7 goals Sweden have conceded have come from headers. Makes sense to put the big man up front. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pink_triangle Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 I think every country whether it be Germany or Greece should worry about possibly playing Spain. Their competitive record is amazing, its not as if others haven't tried to frustrate and nick a goal before. It's not easy when you spend all game chasing the ball after a long season, its where mistakes creep in. I'm not saying its impossible but think some are acting as if tight, defensive football is a new invention by the English. Hodgson hasn't turned england from Brazil to Greece. Ever since I can remember England have defended deep at tournaments and failed to keep goal leads. There is no evidence they have perfected the technique, they didn't last long against France! Agree playing Carroll seems sensible. Also usefull for defending set pieces. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pink_triangle Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 (edited) Well they can put in that much effort when off the ball because they're so rarely off it. It makes it a hell of a lot easier. Edited June 15, 2012 by pink_triangle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nal Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Got to give it to the irish fans, they have gone out and had a good laugh and as roy keane said a bit of a sing song! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eFestivals Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Unbelievable support. gotta agree with that - singing like you're winning when you're not. Just happy to be there, to enjoy it. And around 8 times as many Irish there as there are English. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_hedge Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 I'm not sure if agree with Roy Keane's comments after the game or not. I see where he is coming from but on the other hand seems harsh. Didn't he fall out with Mick beacuse he felt the who set up was just there to make up the numbers and he couldn't understand why they didin't think they could win it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Nal Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 (edited) I'm not sure if agree with Roy Keane's comments after the game or not. I see where he is coming from but on the other hand seems harsh. Didn't he fall out with Mick beacuse he felt the who set up was just there to make up the numbers and he couldn't understand why they didin't think they could win it? Edited June 15, 2012 by The Nal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strummer77 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 (edited) You really do like to spit your dummy don't you... Go have a lie down... lmao Edited June 15, 2012 by strummer77 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strummer77 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Roy's press conference yesterday: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pink_triangle Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Wouldn't say responding at length to a load of jibes is spitting my dummy out. But you can't respond can you Barry? Can you actually address any of those points? Or just a childish little quip again that carefully negates having to address the point? You could be a Tory MP! But then again from a man ignoring people's differing financial situations, spouting sexist rubbish in one thread and deluded religious rubbish in another, what else would you expect? Depends. We should aim at not letting them get enough of the ball to let him cause problems. If we let them get enough, he can cause problems to whoever. I reckon English sides may underestimate him also at times simply because of his relative lack of success against teams from our country. Edit: Here's an article by Rafa on the Ibra subject... his analysis will be better than mine! http://www.independe...ic-7851987.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strummer77 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 (edited) lol You really do bang on don't you I could respond but you can't take it Edited June 15, 2012 by strummer77 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Well one is working tonight, last weekend then 18 days of woo hoo. Any one know of any apps for android for tv to watch the England game( think its on BBC). I have sky gobut no ITV/bbc on there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jump Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Edit: Here's an article by Rafa on the Ibra subject... his analysis will be better than mine! http://www.independe...ic-7851987.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 nice little stat. xavi and iniesta made more passes than the whole ireland team last night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eFestivals Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 nice little stat. xavi and iniesta made more passes than the whole ireland team last night. yeah, but playing ping-pong with other team members doesn't actually get to mean too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thetime Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 yeah, but playing ping-pong with other team members doesn't actually get to mean too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eFestivals Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 knackers the opposition out chasing though. if they're foolish enough to do it, yeah. I think Woy got it about right in his interview the other day. It's not the amount of possession which counts, but what you do with that possession. TV stats makes fools of people. Possession and/or passes completed mean nothing by themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benj Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 http://www.independe...ic-7851987.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benj Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 if they're foolish enough to do it, yeah. I think Woy got it about right in his interview the other day. It's not the amount of possession which counts, but what you do with that possession. TV stats makes fools of people. Possession and/or passes completed mean nothing by themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eFestivals Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Indeed, teams should just sit back, let them stroke their 10,000 passed about to their hearts content, when they nick the ball just hoof it up to some sprinter up top and hope for the best. Worked for Chelsea not quite that, but almost. Was it QPR that gave Scholes all the time and space he wanted to pick his passes, and paid the price? I forget. A team (as Chelsea did) have to apply a bit of pressure so that the opposition aren't able to make the pass they want to make, while at the same time not running around like headless chickens doing that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strummer77 Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 I think Woy got it about right in his interview the other day. It's not the amount of possession which counts, but what you do with that possession. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pink_triangle Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 A team (as Chelsea did) have to apply a bit of pressure so that the opposition aren't able to make the pass they want to make, while at the same time not running around like headless chickens doing that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eFestivals Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 That's misleading though. You've got a far better chance of 'doing' something with the ball if you have a lot of it. The best sides always dominate possession. A few (i.e. Chelsea) do win without, but they are luck dominated victories. I'd say it's less misleading than any concentration on possession stats or passes-completed stats, which mean absolutely nothing by themselves. But I agree with your general point. Any team can only do something useful when they have the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_hedge Posted June 15, 2012 Report Share Posted June 15, 2012 Whilst the "ping pong' passes might not lead to much, when your winning the game those "ping pong" passes between each other means a hell of a lot. Eats up time and when you have the ball they can't score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.