Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Who is the 3rd headliner likely to be?


Guest adele92

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ah yes, I've seen this about. To be honest, I think they were clever in what they said as so it was very hard, almost too hard to work out. I also don't think it's clear cut between played with and played on the same stage subbing. It's too vague as you say to get a picture but it's designed so all us lot wonder. Although, I don't think Green Day, I don't think either Metallica or RATM unless they randomly announce a new album's out within the next 2 or so weeks, and that'd be cutting it fine. Metallica from what I've heard tour R&L on the release of a new album, why play a greatest hits set this year when they could just play next or the year after (new album dependent?)

Sabbath do have a new album out, and although toured 4 times as ozzfest support and there was possible other times too, the actual missing point is if/when they played with each other (we don't even know what kinda show it was). Linkin Park the same, new album, have played the same fest as them before and as recent as 2011 but if/when did they together. Different days so they may not have even seen each other at Download, or even in 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno what you mean about Sabbath but I agree with these points. Not to forget The Prodigy who, if you dismiss the 'played with' thing as meaning 'we got a r£ally r£ally good offer' then they seem the most logical choice.

It really would be atrocious. Linkin Park, Eminem, Fall Out Boy and to some extent SOAD would be too much of a 'hey look at your favourite bands from the start of puberty' lineup. Everyone will be skateboarding around the site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said it would make sense for the festival's 'new' direction if the act was more pop than heavy, however the third headliner is who SOAD are playing under and who they have played with before and are apparently looking forward to playing with. Not sure how many 'pop' acts that would cover, although of course that depends on your definition of pop.

it wasn't really meant as anything to do with any definition of pop, but as an indication of being something away from 'heavy'.

But anyway, that was merely me speculating. It might well be completely wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...