Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2013-2014


Guest kaosmark2

Recommended Posts

I'm assuming you're a Liverpool with a comment like that. Apologies if not. Don't know what to say about your relegation comment, not sure where that came from - of course I wouldn't think that. I agree it is an incredible achievement, wherever they finish, and I have said nothing suggesting otherwise so please don't suggest I am being 'c**tish'. I was simply stating that if Liverpool had been competing in the CL this season, or if Chels and City had not, then they would not be where they are now. If Chelsea lose the league to Liverpoo by 1 point, losing to them between the 2 semi final legs, and then won the Champions League, would you think this proves Liverpool are the better team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm assuming you're a Liverpool with a comment like that. Apologies if not. Don't know what to say about your relegation comment, not sure where that came from - of course I wouldn't think that. I agree it is an incredible achievement, wherever they finish, and I have said nothing suggesting otherwise so please don't suggest I am being 'c**tish'. I was simply stating that if Liverpool had been competing in the CL this season, or if Chels and City had not, then they would not be where they are now. If Chelsea lose the league to Liverpoo by 1 point, losing to them between the 2 semi final legs, and then won the Champions League, would you think this proves Liverpool are the better team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That non-participation in the Champions League/Europe is advantageous to a team's prospects of winning the league is a figment of your imagination. Whole system is designed to reward/encourage participation in both.

LFC performance this year is tough to comprehend - yes I'm a fan of nearly 30 years - so it's no surprise people are coming up with guff like this. Achieving a league title with no participation in Europe id argue is more impressive not less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That non-participation in the Champions League/Europe is advantageous to a team's prospects of winning the league is a figment of your imagination. Whole system is designed to reward/encourage participation in both.

LFC performance this year is tough to comprehend - yes I'm a fan of nearly 30 years - so it's no surprise people are coming up with guff like this. Achieving a league title with no participation in Europe id argue is more impressive not less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you can say one way or another, we will see next season and how you cope.

It's certainly helped rest players and keeping the fresh. No muscle injuries from players suffering from fatigue, certainly helped gerrard who is perhaps past playing both in quick succession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! You sure talk a load of twaddle. How about explaining your points rather that simply stating them as fact. You also carefully avoided my question. Care to explain how Chelsea playing 2 Champions League semi finals (against a stronger team than any in England) either side of the league game does not disadvantage them? It is an enormous advantage to Liverpoo. They are able to spend all week preparing for the game and their players will be rested whereas Chelsea's will most probably be knackered. I fail to see how you cannot accept that it is more difficult to play 65 games a season that 45! You're telling me that Liverpool would be doing better this season if they were also having to compete in Europe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But mealy-mouthed for me chief. We've had fair share of injuries, squad is tiny vs other sides.

LFC just have exemplary team spirit at the moment. As good as I've seen at the club in 20 years. Irrespective of performance in CL or EL next year the collective effort is palpable. Other clubs can try to devalue/undermine progress with nonsensical arguments such as "win the league easier with no euro footie" but they'll fail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Wooderson's making the point that the disadvantages of not being in Europe (less cashflow and less attractive to new signings) outweigh the negatives of being in Europe (more games), so overall it's probably easier to win the league if you are in the Champions League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Wooderson's making the point that the disadvantages of not being in Europe (less cashflow and less attractive to new signings) outweigh the negatives of being in Europe (more games), so overall it's probably easier to win the league if you are in the Champions League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in making comparisons with last season to talk about a 7th to 1st shot in improvement needs to be made in the context that Liverpool significantly underperformed last season and probably with their squad should have been (at least competitive for a couple of spaces higher. Still fantastic improvement in a year when others have stood still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in making comparisons with last season to talk about a 7th to 1st shot in improvement needs to be made in the context that Liverpool significantly underperformed last season and probably with their squad should have been (at least competitive for a couple of spaces higher. Still fantastic improvement in a year when others have stood still.

I do love how opinions have changed. :lol:

Almost everyone spent the first half of this season saying that Liverpool wouldn't make 4th, and that if they were as high as 5th they'd be a big point gap between 5th and 4th.

Now it's that the only reason they've gone from 7th to 1st is because they under-performed last season. :lol:

The real facts are these - facts I put in people's faces at the start of the season, and no one would accept them as meaningful....

1. Last January, Liverpool signed Sturridge.

2. from then till the end of the season, they played at a level which would have got them 4th place as a season's average.

3. Suarez missed a chunk of those games, and their level was 4th.

4. first half of this season Suarez missed a chunk of those games, and their level was 4th.

5. Suarez isn't missing, and their level is 1st.

The only thing mixed in with that isn't a laughable claim of under-performance last season, it's in fact a real claim of real improvements by some players (Sterling, Coutinho, Hendo, Allen - and even Gerrard, who is 2nd best Prem player this season by most stats [with Suarez as 1st]) this season.

FFS. Under-performed. :lol::lol::lol:

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do love how opinions have changed. :lol:

Almost everyone spent the first half of this season saying that Liverpool wouldn't make 4th, and that if they were as high as 5th they'd be a big point gap between 5th and 4th.

Now it's that the only reason they've gone from 7th to 1st is because they under-performed last season. :lol:

The real facts are these - facts I put in people's faces at the start of the season, and no one would accept them as meaningful....

1. Last January, Liverpool signed Sturridge.

2. from then till the end of the season, they played at a level which would have got them 4th place as a season's average.

3. Suarez missed a chunk of those games, and their level was 4th.

4. first half of this season Suarez missed a chunk of those games, and their level was 4th.

5. Suarez isn't missing, and their level is 1st.

The only thing mixed in with that isn't a laughable claim of under-performance last season, it's in fact a real claim of real improvements by some players (Sterling, Coutinho, Hendo, Allen - and even Gerrard, who is 2nd best Prem player this season by most stats [with Suarez as 1st]) this season.

FFS. Under-performed. :lol::lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with most of that, apart from the last line. There is no doubt Liverpool underperformed last season, they finished below at least 1 club with a lower wage/transfer budget. Everton winning the league this season would be far more amazing, despite the fact everton finished 1 place above.

It would, but not because Liverpool under-performed last season. As I've already pointed out, with the same players they're using now they averaged 4th!!!!

The difference between how Liverpool have gone this season and how Everton have gone this season compared to last season is due to the potential Liverpool had in some players last season that are now matching that potential.

That's not because they under-performed last season, it's because they've improved this season in the way that young players are expected to improve. Everton have fewer players you'd realistically expect that improvement from.

You'd have to be mad to think that Sterling, Allen, Flanagan, Henderson & Coutinho aren't all in the stage of their career where you'd be hoping for decent improvements.... and they've all made very decent improvements.

Gerrard is the one player would you might pin the 'under-perform' tag onto for last season given that he's a more important player in league stats this season, but that probably has more to do with him having changed position to one that better suits his age.

Edited by eFestivals
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...