Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Age strictness?


Guest benbot52

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Those aged 13 -15 must purchase a full priced Weekend or Day ticket and can only enter the campsites (weekend ticket holders only) and arena accompanied by a ticket holding adult.
------
One of my WBC Team had a 13 year old daughter at Reading 2012 and she was being looked after by her Adult uncle on the Friday as they were walking though into the arena the girl was stopped she pointed to her Uncle - Security then asked him for Proof that he was her Uncle and when he mentioned he did not have anything on him ' they were both ' placed in a Security Compound.
Now I cant explain why he was not carrying any ID all I know was that he could not establish he was her uncle.
They then mentioned that the girls Mother was working at it and that is when they contacted the WBC who then spoke to the Mother and she went down to the Security Compound .
She was carrying ID so could prove she was the Mother and it was only at that point was the girl and Uncle released.
All this took over two hours .
She never did find out why they wanted to establish who was who all she knows was it was a major hassle to get it sorted out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did she then tell him to get stuffed because there's no legal grounds for proof of relationship?

its not a Court of Law and it does No good trying to argue the toss as Security can stop anyone from entering so its plain daft trying to be a barrack-room lawyer.
Its all down to them claiming that as ' she was a child ' they could not let her go without a close relative being able to look after her.
The Fault was with the Uncle as he knew that during the day he would be looking after the girl but for some daft reason he forgot to bring suitable ID with him.
Right or Wrong it does not matter - Once her Mother was able to prove who she was the problem was solved.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This year will be my 25th year working at Reading and over that time behind the Bars the age where a person will be asked for ID has gone up.
Anyone under 30 would be wise to take ID with them as bar staff are told not to take any risks - its not down to the bar staff proving your legal its down to you.
I am sure Security are also advised not to take any chances.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not a Court of Law and it does No good trying to argue the toss as Security can stop anyone from entering so its plain daft trying to be a barrack-room lawyer.

Its all down to them claiming that as ' she was a child ' they could not let her go without a close relative being able to look after her.

The Fault was with the Uncle as he knew that during the day he would be looking after the girl but for some daft reason he forgot to bring suitable ID with him.

Right or Wrong it does not matter - Once her Mother was able to prove who she was the problem was solved.

Yeah but conditions of entry is to be accompanied by an adult ticket holder. What if the girl was being accompanied by a friend of the family? How can you possibly prove that?

What if the uncle had ID but being an uncle had a different surname.

What we if people were taking sons or daughters and friends of those sons and daughters.

There surely cannot be a condition to prove this. In the cases above they would simply have to believe the word of the customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but conditions of entry is to be accompanied by an adult ticket holder. What if the girl was being accompanied by a friend of the family? How can you possibly prove that?

What if the uncle had ID but being an uncle had a different surname.

What we if people were taking sons or daughters and friends of those sons and daughters.

There surely cannot be a condition to prove this. In the cases above they would simply have to believe the word of the customers.

sure there is lots of questions but they decided to stop her - now what was said I cant say as we were both working at the time - all we know for certain was they were both taken to a Security Compound and they were demanding proof that she was with a relative.
Once it gets to that stage - its pointless trying to argue .
We do know that the group { there was five adults and the girl } were trying to rush though the arena entry point to see some band and this may have attracted attention to themselves.
It may not have been correct but once taken to the Security Compound that girl was not allowed to leave until her Mother showed up.
All this took ages as they were not carrying their phones at the time.
So they both missed the band they were wanting to see.
Its all well good trying to argue fine points but if Security decide they will not let you in its very difficult to argue the toss .
Once her Mother showed up the problem was solved.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...