Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎


Acid_Haze

Recommended Posts

I'm in the middle between Blur/Roses. Love a fair few songs by both, though outside of that I can take or leave them, saying that I really respect John Squire as a guitar player so I guess the Roses would just edge it. Prince is the 'realistic' headliner I would like the most though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • FloorFiller

    1190

  • Rose-Colored Boy

    1060

  • Matt42

    1040

  • eFestivals

    1008

There seems to be nothing concrete to link the Roses but I reckon it would be a sensible booking. The headline slots seems to be missing a classic British indie guitar band. The Roses certainly fit the mould.

I think it would be a big scoop to get the Roses premièring new material at Glastonbury, 20 years after they were due to play and 20 odd years since they released any new material.

This is all conjecture on my part really. But I think the Foos, Kanye and The Roses would be a diverse trio which ticks a lot of boxes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to be nothing concrete to link the Roses but I reckon it would be a sensible booking. The headline slots seems to be missing a classic British indie guitar band. The Roses certainly fit the mould.

I think it would be a big scoop to get the Roses premièring new material at Glastonbury, 20 years after they were due to play and 20 odd years since they released any new material.

This is all conjecture on my part really. But I think the Foos, Kanye and The Roses would be a diverse trio which ticks a lot of boxes.

Would be a great trio for me, give me time to explore/see another headliner friday, great time on the pyramid on saturday and then I'd like to see the roses on sunday but wouldn't be gutted if another act was playing on WH/park/other etc.

Also where did the big font size thing go, I found that funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm a watcher on this (is that what they're called? people who read threads but don't post often).

i've missed the last couple of days, whats the deal with the sudden Stone Roses talk and the 2/1 odds with Paddy Power? i can't be bothered to go back and read up on 80 odd pages of Kanye/simpsons/taylor swift chat

Where has this come from?

i'd love it to be true, but know it's probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm a watcher on this (is that what they're called? people who read threads but don't post often).

i've missed the last couple of days, whats the deal with the sudden Stone Roses talk and the 2/1 odds with Paddy Power? i can't be bothered to go back and read up on 80 odd pages of Kanye/simpsons/taylor swift chat

Where has this come from?

i'd love it to be true, but know it's probably not.

Some people wanting it to happen then getting overexcited when a troll turned up claiming it would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm a watcher on this (is that what they're called? people who read threads but don't post often).

i've missed the last couple of days, whats the deal with the sudden Stone Roses talk and the 2/1 odds with Paddy Power? i can't be bothered to go back and read up on 80 odd pages of Kanye/simpsons/taylor swift chat

Where has this come from?

i'd love it to be true, but know it's probably not.

some geezer popped up on here and said it was true.

Then the world went mad.

Make up your own mind. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is photoshop, it was done quite quickly - the screenshot was taken while the reader was on page 877 of this thread, which if was the most current page on the thread was some time between 3.37pm-4.01pm.

The first attempted post of the screenshot was 4.13pm. Given that the bet was placed at 4.03pm, I'm no photoshop pro so is ten minutes enough to knock it up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is photoshop, it was done quite quickly - the screenshot was taken while the reader was on page 877 of this thread, which if was the most current page on the thread was some time between 3.37pm-4.01pm.

The first attempted post of the screenshot was 4.13pm. Given that the bet was placed at 4.03pm, I'm no photoshop pro so is ten minutes enough to knock it up?

what are you referring to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is photoshop, it was done quite quickly - the screenshot was taken while the reader was on page 877 of this thread, which if was the most current page on the thread was some time between 3.37pm-4.01pm.

The first attempted post of the screenshot was 4.13pm. Given that the bet was placed at 4.03pm, I'm no photoshop pro so is ten minutes enough to knock it up?

Yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...