Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Football 2015/16


TheGayTent

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

15 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I wont go overboard on Rashford based on a couple of games, however for all his faults LVG at least has given the youth the chance. If Mourhino comes in than the days are numbered for these types of players.

No way can LVG be taking credit for 'giving youth a chance', he literally has no other option but to play them. With a fully fit squad you're telling me LVG plays Rashford, that's bollocks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mjsell said:

No way can LVG be taking credit for 'giving youth a chance', he literally has no other option but to play them. With a fully fit squad you're telling me LVG plays Rashford, that's bollocks. 

MOTD just said he has given 11 academy players debuts. That just doesn't happen if Mou is in charge. The fully fit squad argument is silly, as one of the main reason young players ever get opportunities is because clubs don't tend to have fully fit squads over a season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, mjsell said:

No way can LVG be taking credit for 'giving youth a chance', he literally has no other option but to play them. With a fully fit squad you're telling me LVG plays Rashford, that's bollocks. 

He had the choice to keep the likes of RVP and Hernandez.

Of course he wouldn't of picked the likes of rashford if Rooney and martial was fit,  then again if he keeps improving he will have to be picked. In the same way lingard is pretty much a first 11 player now, he's taken his chance. 

LVG has said he works with a small squad so that youth get a chance. Its up to the youth to take the chance.

Edited by thetime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pink_triangle said:

MOTD just said he has given 11 academy players debuts. That just doesn't happen if Mou is in charge. The fully fit squad argument is silly, as one of the main reason young players ever get opportunities is because clubs don't tend to have fully fit squads over a season.

That doesn't happen if mou is in charge because he is a 2 season manager that is there to win a title not hope that one of the kids comes good for him. He would make sure he has an experienced squad to fall back on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mjsell said:

That doesn't happen if mou is in charge because he is a 2 season manager that is there to win a title not hope that one of the kids comes good for him. He would make sure he has an experienced squad to fall back on. 

I wouldn't argue with that and I think that's the perfect reason why mou is not the right man for the job 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, kaosmark2 said:

Are you suggesting a game vs Man U is bigger than a FA Cup final?

Deluded....

Villa? The worst Premier League team ever? That was a rare occasion when they did. They don't have any big gamer players really. Yesterday was a big game. Its a consistent theme with Arsenal.

1 hour ago, eFestivals said:

to be fair, the sort of game where the opposition all sit back behind the ball has never suited Theo, so it's no surprise he didn't have much impact. The surprise for me was him being in the team in the first place for a game like this.

True. He had chances to run in behind though. Didn't do it. Or wasn't given the ball. He can't really hold the ball up either. 

Anyway, are Leicester actually going to do it!?

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

Looks like it, doesn't it?

I've got to say, it'll be fantastic if they do ... and will have all the big spenders looking at themselves and wondering where it all went wrong.

Difficult to say, Leicester have the 2 extra points, while spurs have the better squad. I think both have a pretty equal chance, with arsenal slightly less and city still a slight possibility.

Is Leicester struggling to break down a poor Norwich team the sign of a team running out of steam, or the sign of champions. We will probably have a better idea in a few games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pink_triangle said:

I'm not sure one season of an underdog winning is evidence that big spending isn't the way forward, it would need to 'be repeated before drawing those conclusions.

Not suggesting it is. But maybe these clubs will think twice before parting with their cash. Maybe give a youth player a chance before spunking the cash. Maybe get the scouts working a bit harder. 

Di Maria cost Utd £60 million. Leicester payed £400k for Mahrez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...