Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Who Is The Greatest Artist of all Time?


TheSilence

  

49 members have voted

  1. 1. Who Is The Best Artist of all Time?

    • The Beatles
      13
    • Led Zeppelin
      6
    • The Rolling Stones
      0
    • David Bowie
      3
    • Elvis Presley
      2
    • The Beach Boys
      0
    • Talking Heads
      1
    • REM
      0
    • Radiohead
      4
    • Bob Dylan
      2
    • AC/DC
      0
    • The Who
      0
    • Chuck Berry
      0
    • The Kinks
      0
    • Prince
      0
    • Pink Floyd
      2
    • Eric Clapton
      0
    • Jimi Hendrix
      1
    • Queen
      2
    • Someone Else
      13


Recommended Posts

Exactly, Joan Baez and many more.  Bjork is a wonderful artist, but to an extent she exists in her own musical and artistic bubble.

 

Joni Mitchell's blue was the album that defined the line between me being a child and a grown up, part of my musical education in a west country squat during the best summer ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Bjork's inimitable, but not uninfluential, I hear Bjork in a lot of contemporary artists. Specifically, I hear her influence in FKA Twigs and Young Fathers, two of the most exciting artists on the rise today, I think even Kanye has been at her back catalogue pretty much since Late Registration. Male, female, animal, vegetable, mineral, I think Bjork is the ultimate recording artist.

Edited by GETOFFAMYLAWN
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd probably say that Bjork is my favourite female artist and potentially the best but I'll refuse to entertain the idea that she's as good or better than The Beatles, Led Zep, Pink Floyd or the Rolling Stones. It's just not true.

I think she's far better than any of those, for the aforementioned reason that she constantly reinvents herself and her sound.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love a pointless discussion with no possible correct answer.

My thoughts on the above is that reinventing yourself doesn't necessarily equate to being great. Or even good for that matter.

Unless someone wants to try to argue that Madonna is good...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love a pointless discussion with no possible correct answer.

My thoughts on the above is that reinventing yourself doesn't necessarily equate to being great. Or even good for that matter.

Unless someone wants to try to argue that Madonna is good...

That will be the multi-talentless Madonna?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love a pointless discussion with no possible correct answer.

My thoughts on the above is that reinventing yourself doesn't necessarily equate to being great. Or even good for that matter.

Unless someone wants to try to argue that Madonna is good...

We all love pointless discussions, if we didn't we wouldn't hang out on an internet forum.

 

I'd agree with your point though. I just think acts that are already great become greater by continuing to do new things. Radiohead, Bjork, Flaming Lips, Bowie. It's why acts like Oasis become tired aged reflections of what they once were while other acts remain fresh and exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all love pointless discussions, if we didn't we wouldn't hang out on an internet forum.

I'd agree with your point though. I just think acts that are already great become greater by continuing to do new things. Radiohead, Bjork, Flaming Lips, Bowie. It's why acts like Oasis become tired aged reflections of what they once were while other acts remain fresh and exciting.

I'd say that artists reinventing themselves definitely opens up new windows to explore themselves musically. If the talents there then it will work whereas if, a particularly untalented artist attempted to reinvent themselves it would, probably, fall flat.

That is a strong argument for Bjork being better than the artists I mentioned, bar the Beatles ;), but I think there are a lot more factors to take in to consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all love pointless discussions, if we didn't we wouldn't hang out on an internet forum.

I'd agree with your point though. I just think acts that are already great become greater by continuing to do new things. Radiohead, Bjork, Flaming Lips, Bowie. It's why acts like Oasis become tired aged reflections of what they once were while other acts remain fresh and exciting.

Nice post until you name checked 5 artists - 3 of which are utter utter cack.

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reinvention as an artist is important of course but you can't compare some of the older artists with anything post Beatles really. They just didn't have the freedom. John Lee Hookers Devil's Jump (basically invented distortion) was as big a step for music as Strawberry Fields was. Just a lot more subtle. But Hooker was hardly a chameleon when it came to his music. 100 albums of dirty blues basically.

 

1949 for those counting by the way. 1949!!

 

Dave Davies was two years old.

 

Edited by The Nal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

indeed...

 

re-inventing smacks of band wagon jumping a lot of the time, especially in Madge's case. Not with Bjork though. I don't consider her are-inventor. She's an explorer... all the time, so not really re-inventing.

 

Re-inventing sounds like, "I don't know what I am, I'll try this for a while" without really having much of an aim

 

again, like Madge

 

I prefer my artists to sound like they know what they're aiming for

 

aneil-young-everybody-s-rockin.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love both those songs! Think I might be blinded/deafened by my love for them though. My least favourite song on white album is Glass Onion and ive been told by many a person im an idiot for that. :P

Yeah its my least favourite song on the Whit Album too.

 

Whats your favourite Beatles album, out of interest?

 

I'd have to say, The Best Of The Beatles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What three? 

 

Off the Wall, Thriller and Bad.

 

Think he's great for what he did for pop music to be fair, but besides his singles I struggle to enjoy his work. No idea why. Also very hard to swallow considering his legal "issues."

 

Its impossible not to move to Billie Jean.

 

I think he was quite guilty but never proven. So, enjoy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off the Wall, Thriller and Bad.

 

 

Its impossible not to move to Billie Jean.

 

I think he was quite guilty but never proven. So, enjoy!

 

Yeah, I also think he was quite guilty. You don't agree on a settlement if you're not guilty. I know I personally would fight tooth and nail till I was found not guilty rather than pay any amount of money to shut them up. So I find it hard to enjoy him. I do have the odd listen, every now and then, though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...