Jump to content

Who named the thingy the thingy?


nban2010
 Share

Recommended Posts

In this dark and dull time where the headliners have pretty much been guessed and no line-up announcements are in sight, the most important question to ask:

Who was the first to call the thingy the thingy?

This thread is for strictly thingy discussions.

Edited by nban2010
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As I understand it The Thingy became self aware several years ago, calling itself 'Thingy' and announcing itself as the holder of all date/Glastonbury knowledge. Shortly after he/she/it got a bit up themselves and demanded to be known as 'The' Thingy in order to differentiate it from other, lesser thingys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Couchyinsisted on calling the Thingy the Menu for a bit. But it became clear that the Menu is obviously the Line Up in full whereas the Thingy details dates leading up to the presentation of the Menu in full.

The Thingy became self-aware nanoseconds after the Big Bang around the same time space, time and early elements formed.

The Thingy is infinite but with boundaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SwedgeAntilles said:

Do not be tricked by these false Thingys, bow to the one true Thingy less ye be smited and unsure as to whence announcements shall be madeth 

As we all in agreement that @Gnomicide's Thingy is the one true thingy...if you'll pardon the expression?

 

 

Edit to clarify: rather Gmony's Thingy is the most recent, fully evolved of its proto-Thingy ancestors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you want to learn about things

http://users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/filmphilology/heideggerworkofart.pdf

"What, in truth, is a thing insofar as it is a thing? When we ask this question we wish to know the thing-being (the thingliness) of the thing. The point is to learn the thingliness of the thing. To this end we must become acquainted with the sphere within which are to be found all those beings which we have long called things." (Heidegger, 1950)

Edited by Acid_Haze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Acid_Haze said:

if you want to learn about things

http://users.clas.ufl.edu/burt/filmphilology/heideggerworkofart.pdf

"What, in truth, is a thing insofar as it is a thing? When we ask this question we wish to know the thing-being (the thingliness) of the thing. The point is to learn the thingliness of the thing. To this end we must become acquainted with the sphere within which are to be found all those beings which we have long called things." (Heidegger, 1950)

I wonder who'd win in a fight between Heidegger & Schrodingers cats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Woffy said:

I wonder who'd win in a fight between Heidegger & Schrodingers cats.

If Schrodinger's cat can't get out of the box, or we open it and find it's dead, then game over, and Heidegger wins, surely?

*rings William Hill to quickly place bet*

Edited by carlosj
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...