Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

Brexit Schmexit


LJS

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

I don't disagree.

The fudge will involve a form of words that doesn't rule out the wants of both sides, while suggesting they'll happen but not committing to anything. "we want the same things but more talks required" or something.

Much like the agreement last December that claimed these were committed-to things while also saying nothing was agreed until everything was agreed.

Oh sorry I see what you mean, a fudge to get a withdrawl agreement approved. 

The only problem with the WA is that it may well preserve our trade and other treaty arrangements with the EU states. But that is not the case with non-EU states. Even with a WA, in March 2019 we leave the EU. Will all the states that the EU has trade agreements with really treat us as if we were still in the EU without a murmur? It seems unlikely.

What about the many other arrangements that go via the EU like the EU-US Open Skies agreement? With Trump in the White House it's absolutely not clear that agreements like that will still be honoured in the transition.

An extension to A50 is our best hope (assuming that reversing the referendum result is a non-starter).

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2018 at 11:27 PM, Ommadawn said:

Well, mainly on your ridiculous pessimism.

So absolutely nothing at all then. Fair enough, you're most certainly not alone.

I sincerely hope you do remain ignorant of the topic though, because the reality of what we seem likely to be heading towards is thoroughly depressing. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zahidf said:

Not having a plan on opposition outside of an election is different to being on government with a deadline.

true, but over brexit I'll be cheering the one who isn't determined to throw us off a cliff, if we get a reversal from one of the parties who currently want to chuck us over. It's not only tories who can be morons. 

If what we got was May's 'Chequers deal' (we won't, but go with this) it's a damned sight better than no deal - and Jez and co would vote to give us no deal. Think about it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

true, but over brexit I'll be cheering the one who isn't determined to throw us off a cliff, if we get a reversal from one of the parties who currently want to chuck us over. It's not only tories who can be morons. 

If what we got was May's 'Chequers deal' (we won't, but go with this) it's a damned sight better than no deal - and Jez and co would vote to give us no deal. Think about it!

Depends: if it's 'vote for people's vote with option to remain' or chequers deal, then I can live with that 

Labour conference this week should firm up whether they are asking for another vote.

(Which I'm.not  in favour of, but I acknowledge my preferred ignore the last referendum result doesn't have much backint)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, zahidf said:

(Which I'm.not  in favour of, but I acknowledge my preferred ignore the last referendum result doesn't have much backint)

saying a public vote can be ignored is saying you want democracy to end - cos if the EUref can be ignored entirely then so could an election vote.

It needs a specific vote on the EU to get ourselves out of this shit with any sort of sense beyond stopping brexit. A general election can't do it, either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't really the political, legal, and logistical time to organise another referendum before A50 triggers. 6 months to decide the question and answers, get it through parliament, and arrange the voting thing. It's either going to be no deal, a shit deal, or an A50 extension. The chance to can Brexit has gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, kaosmark2 said:

There isn't really the political, legal, and logistical time to organise another referendum before A50 triggers. 6 months to decide the question and answers, get it through parliament, and arrange the voting thing. It's either going to be no deal, a shit deal, or an A50 extension. The chance to can Brexit has gone.

there's the time to do it. There was an election called and done and dusted within 3 months (and that's more complicated). There's not the will to do it, but that's a different thing.

There's still all options open in practical terms for how it can still play-out, tho of course some are more likely than others .... and I can't see "pretend the ref didn't happen" as being near the top of those. We are where we are, and not only do we have to think about the brexit problem, we also need to think about consequences beyond that - and saying 'votes don't matter to politicians if politicians change their minds' isn't one for good future stability.

meanwhile...

Rabb's gone mad, saying "We have been rebuffed on our plans without any coherent explanation as to why", and complaining that there's "no credible alternative on the table from the EU". When the ministers are so fucking thick that they don't get any part of the problem, we're fucked.

And just to make sure we're not in any doubt, looks like May's going to try and tough it out.  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

there's the time to do it. There was an election called and done and dusted within 3 months (and that's more complicated). There's not the will to do it, but that's a different thing.

There's still all options open in practical terms for how it can still play-out, tho of course some are more likely than others .... and I can't see "pretend the ref didn't happen" as being near the top of those. We are where we are, and not only do we have to think about the brexit problem, we also need to think about consequences beyond that - and saying 'votes don't matter to politicians if politicians change their minds' isn't one for good future stability.

meanwhile...

Rabb's gone mad, saying "We have been rebuffed on our plans without any coherent explanation as to why", and complaining that there's "no credible alternative on the table from the EU". When the ministers are so fucking thick that they don't get any part of the problem, we're fucked.

And just to make sure we're not in any doubt, looks like May's going to try and tough it out.  ;)

Theresa mays big speech has to be postponed.

 

Because of a lack of power in number 10

Ha ha ha ha ha

Edited by zahidf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

there's the time to do it. There was an election called and done and dusted within 3 months (and that's more complicated). There's not the will to do it, but that's a different thing.

There's still all options open in practical terms for how it can still play-out, tho of course some are more likely than others .... and I can't see "pretend the ref didn't happen" as being near the top of those. We are where we are, and not only do we have to think about the brexit problem, we also need to think about consequences beyond that - and saying 'votes don't matter to politicians if politicians change their minds' isn't one for good future stability.

meanwhile...

Rabb's gone mad, saying "We have been rebuffed on our plans without any coherent explanation as to why", and complaining that there's "no credible alternative on the table from the EU". When the ministers are so fucking thick that they don't get any part of the problem, we're fucked.

And just to make sure we're not in any doubt, looks like May's going to try and tough it out.  ;)

In many ways, an election is simpler, as the question and answers don't have to be decided. The candidates have to be given some time to prepare, but with a referendum, it'd take a lot longer to get through parliament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kaosmark2 said:

In many ways, an election is simpler, as the question and answers don't have to be decided. The candidates have to be given some time to prepare, but with a referendum, it'd take a lot longer to get through parliament.

An election would require the parties to decide on answers to the brexit question. It couldn't be ignored.

So ultimately an election would become a referendum by another name, but with less democratic terms to it or outcome from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, eFestivals said:

yup, it's the only way they can play it, or appear to be morons.

Is Jez going to give up being a moron before he proves himself a moron? Or are there only morons?

Jez is covering all the bases

"Theresa May’s Brexit negotiating strategy has been a disaster. The Tories have spent more time arguing among themselves than negotiating with the EU.

From day one, the Prime Minister has looked incapable of delivering a good Brexit deal for Britain. The political games from both the EU and our Government need to end because no deal is not an option."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...