Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

2019 Stage Predictions


dentalplan

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Little Andy said:

In regards to female artists, I noticed all my examples were women, and I even went onto the Glastonbury Wiki to find a male example who had played. I just couldn't see one. 

It's a while back, but a very good example would be Robbie Williams in 1998.

Edited by incident
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

How does someone manufacture themselves?

Again, my opinion...

Self manufacture would be an artist deliberately shifting and/or changing their image and/or output in response to a current or predicted decline in popularity, sales or public opinion in order to maintain or regain relevance, exposure and the associated moolah.

So that wouldn't be a change through an artistic desire to try something different or a reflection of the changing musical landscape, but more of a deliberate and conscious desire to be something removed from their previous incarnation in order to achieve a commercial end.

Example - Madonna's reaction post-Erotica to create a softer and less edgy image (which is arguably closer to her real person) in order to minimise and reverse the backlash in popularity and sales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CaledonianGonzo said:

How does someone manufacture themselves?

S'good question.

My understanding of 'manufactured', rightly or wrongly, is when they have little to no impact on the sound of the music. Often they are a pretty face or a dancer or a stereotypically good singer but with no creativity. They typically therefore are given music to sing which appeals to people who are new to music, or don't listen to much music. More credible artists would be writing their music with their own personal and often interesting touch.

How someone manufactures themselves, therefore, I'm not so sure. Obviously shows like X factor show us how it can be done by a Cowell-esque figure. How people otherwise do it, I dunno? Do they send tapes of them singing karaoke style to pop-record companies? Do they sometimes buy songs off generic song-writers? Dunno!

Edited by Little Andy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Specifics are tricky.  Bowie for me managed to pull off the double whammy of doing it across his career while (largely) maintaining some kind of integrity.  But yeah, I think he can be be identified as a perfect example of a constantly self-manufactured series of image changes. There are bigger Bowie fans out there than I who can pick holes in it I'm sure, but I don't think he ever made any secret of his desire for fame?

U2 one I couldn't comment on, purely because I've never paid that much attention tbh :lol:

Like I said, just a thought process. In case you hadn't picked up on it, most of the posts I put out for some kind of sensible discussion are pretty much streams of consciousness and making it up as I go along!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CaledonianGonzo said:

Most manufacturerd band to headline in recent years would be the Stones.  Andrew Loog Oldham plotting their every move and chasing every trend from psychedelia to disco.

Are the band members the main driving force behind the music? If so, I don't see them as particularly manufactured to my ears, cos for me personally its 98% about the music. I would assume, wrongly or rightly, that Beyonce would be the most manufactured recent headliner by my definition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough, my assumptions about Beyonce may well be wrong. For me its all about how much of a say the artist has on the music, or if they're largely given something to sing.

Very often I get the impression that singers who never play an instrument are more likely to be pop puppets, but I accept that is not always the case.

Edited by Little Andy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that just changing one's look or style is necessarily "manufacturing", most artists need to change and evolve to survive. Nobody wants to hear a band fart out five identical sounding records (this is where I applaud the Arctic Monkeys, they may not have always done it successfully, but at least they appear keen to try different things with each release these days). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Little Andy said:

One Direction never even appeared at the festival though. Surely thats cos they were manufactured, I can't think what else it would be? (Just to clarify, I would not want them appear either, I'm just trying to discuss why some pop artists are fair game and some are not)

I don’t think them not appearing has anything to do with being manufactured. It’s probably more to do with Glastonbury selling out every year, and the typical person that attends not being in their target demo. They’re huge, sure, but in a different sphere to the usual Glastonbury goer. Beyoncé headlined because her appeal is much broader and she’s a magnificent performer.

If ticket sales were more driven by a lineup revealed in advance of tickets going on sale then maybe they would have factored in to appeal to a younger crowd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hugh Jass said:

I wouldn't say that just changing one's look or style is necessarily "manufacturing", most artists need to change and evolve to survive. Nobody wants to hear a band fart out five identical sounding records (this is where I applaud the Arctic Monkeys, they may not have always done it successfully, but at least they appear keen to try different things with each release these days). 

Oh yeah, certainly not every change is manufacturing.  That's why I used the Madonna example - it was a clear reactive change to a specific decline in fortunes. 

Also, see my earlier post that effectively puts anything I say in the bucket of "could well be utter bollocks"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, jparx said:

I don’t think them not appearing has anything to do with being manufactured. It’s probably more to do with Glastonbury selling out every year, and the typical person that attends not being in their target demo. They’re huge, sure, but in a different sphere to the usual Glastonbury goer. Beyoncé headlined because her appeal is much broader and she’s a magnificent performer.

If ticket sales were more driven by a lineup revealed in advance of tickets going on sale then maybe they would have factored in to appeal to a younger crowd.

They’re also absolutely terrible live, by all accounts. They were never booked for festivals where ticket sales were based on the line-up, eg V or IOW, either. And nor have any of the members been in their respective solo ‘careers’, as far as I can remember off the top of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

They’re also absolutely terrible live, by all accounts. They were never booked for festivals where ticket sales were based on the line-up, eg V or IOW, either. And nor have any of the members been in their respective solo ‘careers’, as far as I can remember off the top of my head.

T4 on the beach? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

They’re also absolutely terrible live, by all accounts. They were never booked for festivals where ticket sales were based on the line-up, eg V or IOW, either. And nor have any of the members been in their respective solo ‘careers’, as far as I can remember off the top of my head.

They've never played V?? I admit I haven't been following theirs or that festival's fortunes too closely but that genuinely surprises me. You'd have thought they be a stick on one night when the Killers or KOL weren't playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Hugh Jass said:

They've never played V?? I admit I haven't been following theirs or that festival's fortunes too closely but that genuinely surprises me. You'd have thought they be a stick on one night when the Killers or KOL weren't playing.

Nope. As I say, they had a reputation for being appallingly bad live. And they broke up before V started getting desperate enough to lower themselves to the likes of Bieber, probably 1D’s solo equivalent.

Edited by Rose-Colored Boy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Rose-Colored Boy said:

They’re also absolutely terrible live, by all accounts. They were never booked for festivals where ticket sales were based on the line-up, eg V or IOW, either. And nor have any of the members been in their respective solo ‘careers’, as far as I can remember off the top of my head.

Let's be honest though, how quick they sold tickets and how many dates they did, they didn't need festival dates but they did big weekend one year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...