I think people are also underestimating how much extra work it would have been to get another similar legacy headliner to replace him. The way forward means that the festival and him have a good relationship (I don't think Glastonbury are interested in making enemies with many artists) and they don't have to scramble to find someone else, who despite what people have speculated, wouldn't be someone on the level of say Stevie Wonder I don't think.
It's clearly *not* the only consideration when it comes to booking NY. He's a consistently popular live draw in the UK.
Michael's taste will have been a factor over the years and resulted in some specific bookings, but one look at the last few Pyramid line-ups should dissuade you from placing too much emphasis on it these days. I'm sure he's not exactly a massive Burna Boy stan.
And it may be why they acted so quickly and decisively to keep him on as a headliner? It must be a unique situation for any major festival anywhere to be so driven by one individual’s musical taste. I’m not sure if it’s a ‘good thing’ or not.
Basically he's stoking a rising and increasingly violent anti immigrant anti muslim movement across europe. It isn't right wing poopulist, it's right wing racist and violent...which kind of equals fascist...they just need some groovy uniforms.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.