The most interesting question right now is the extent to which Trump is actually MAGA. The Rest is Politics US had some interesting commentary on this.
The idea is that Trump uses his base in a way that benefits him. The evidence for that is his public flip-flopping over decades including donating to various democrat causes or campaigns. Trump isn’t actually interested in MAGA beyond how it serves him, and would be happy for it to die after his second term, so he can egotistically claim that it was all to do with him personally.
So what for his second term? He doesn’t need MAGA any longer. Hence why he’s cosying up to rich ‘friends’ and taking stances they disapprove of.
That implies next level degree chaos as Trump does whatever the hell he likes, pisses off his angry, armed base in the process, and to hell with the future.
Ok, well ICJ have only found a few cases of genocide since it was defined, so not easy to prove...I think intent partly the hardest bit to determine, but also what defines the group. The all or part thing also comes into it, but Israel has destroyed most of Gaza...so.... I think ok to accuse Israel of genocide, ICJ said it was plausible...but I agree that it is thrown at Israel a lot as well as accusing them of being as bad as the Nazis and all that. But, we have this genocide definition, it is plausible Israel has been committing it, we'll see what happens, may well end up that there is just not enough evidence to conclude either way.
Yeah, really does not work well. Also causes a bit of a jam with so many outside the tent for headliners standing or sitting around blocking traffic between Common and Castle.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.