Jump to content

news & politics:discussion


zahidf
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, steviewevie said:

I think some strikes in the 70s were more visible...especially when refuse collectors were striking and rubbish was piling up, or grave diggers striking and dead bodies piling up. 

The big 80s one was the miners strike, and that didn't affect many people except those living in those mining communities of course, but it was in the news every day as became like a civil war with Thatcher taking on the unions, and winning.

We had a coal fire and the miners strike meant no supply and some chilly nights. Wood was in short supply and cost more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rufus Gwertigan said:

We had a coal fire and the miners strike meant no supply and some chilly nights. Wood was in short supply and cost more.

70s or 80s?...I thought in 80s govt had made sure had enough surplus coal so wouldn't run out...?

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Ozanne said:

I’m sure for working parents that are effected by the strikes today that it isn’t a very nice day for them yet support for the strikers seem to be high. These strikes aren’t exactly easy for parents. 

Yeah about the most negative comment I saw from a parent on the local news was something along the lines of "I totally get why they are doing it but I think they should try something other than strike". Everyone else was pretty much " It's a massive ballache (should that be two words? Hyphen maybe? ) but I support what they're doing"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, mcshed said:

Schools aren't on strike up here in sunny Scotland, but before you think we must have it sorted there have been rolling school strikes since November there just aren't any today. All this with the Scottish Government having a 1 billion underspend in the budget last year.

schools budget has been robbed to pay for free uni.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I’m pretty sure the UK going into recession won’t be a good thing for the PM. 

But being shorter than predicted gives him the perfect excuse to say how great he and his policies are.

I saw yesterday Sunak was kicking off at Starmer over the bullying in the Labour Party under his predecessor and how he helped let it run riot. Who did Sunak send u set last?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, steviewevie said:

well yeah...but recession milder than previously expected, and should be over before next election...

It’ll still be a recession though, it doesn’t matter if it will be milder than the BoE once thought. Even if it is over before the election peoples personal finances aren’t likely to be looking amazing by then though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

It’ll still be a recession though, it doesn’t matter if it will be milder than the BoE once thought. Even if it is over before the election peoples personal finances aren’t likely to be looking amazing by then though. 

yeah, people will be fried...and I think they'll likely lose the next election still...but no doubt Sunak will say things are improving, stick with us, don't let those woke north london socialists ruin it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, steviewevie said:

yeah, people will be fried...and I think they'll likely lose the next election still...but no doubt Sunak will say things are improving, stick with us, don't let those woke north london socialists ruin it.

That’s true, Sunak will still claim he’s worked wonders even though we’ll have entered a recession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...