Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Justiceforcedave said:

It’s almost as if having more of the collective wealth of our country distributed to the lower earners would help keep the cogs turning and be a good thing?

…bring on universal income! Something’s gotta give.

if we were doing universal income, we could do decent tax rises to pay for improvements because of the size of tax rises needed to do universal income.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kaosmark2 said:

Labour to continue their imitation of Tories by housing asylum seekers on dodgy barges.

Only temporarily though as they think they'll be able to deport people a lot quicker than the Tories 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, kaosmark2 said:

Labour to continue their imitation of Tories by housing asylum seekers on dodgy barges.

want to show laboyur the alternative housing or are you saying to kick them onto the streets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He clearly didn't read past the headline. Labour have made it clear that, when they come to power, they will have inherited a system where people are housed in these barges, but that they will work to clear it all within months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

He clearly didn't read past the headline. Labour have made it clear that, when they come to power, they will have inherited a system where people are housed in these barges, but that they will work to clear it all within months.

kaos knows that finding accommodation is tough, but forgot that for the refugees with his glee to have a go at labour.

Edited by kaosmark2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Neil said:

kaos knows that finding accommodation is tough, but forgot that for the refugees with his glee to have a go at labour.

It's not surprising given his anti-Labour stance.

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/labour-would-use-barges-house-30639469?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar

For reference here is the article in question where Labour say if they take office they will keep asylum seekers on barges for up to 6 months whilst they work to clear down the backlog.

Edited by kaosmark2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

It's not surprising given his anti-Labour stance.

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/labour-would-use-barges-house-30639469?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar

For reference here is the article in question where Labour say if they take office they will keep asylum seekers on barges for up to 6 months whilst they work to clear down the backlog.

theres also an article on the guardian, not sure about the detail.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/aug/06/labour-would-barges-temporarily-house-asylum-seekers-stephen-kinnock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

He clearly didn't read past the headline. Labour have made it clear that, when they come to power, they will have inherited a system where people are housed in these barges, but that they will work to clear it all within months.

It was very misleading initially I thought the same … read it a bit later and it had been cleared up … others thought similar 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

It's not surprising given his anti-Labour stance.

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/labour-would-use-barges-house-30639469?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar

For reference here is the article in question where Labour say if they take office they will keep asylum seekers on barges for up to 6 months whilst they work to clear down the backlog.

Fair enough, I didn't read past the headline. This is perfectly fair. It had sounded from the headline and a couple of quotes that they were making excuses - not that they were doing it temporarily while changing the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kaosmark2 said:

Fair enough, I didn't read past the headline. This is perfectly fair. It had sounded from the headline and a couple of quotes that they were making excuses - not that they were doing it temporarily while changing the system.

the headline is probably important in winning votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...