Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Neil said:

a free vote wouldn't have been any better , cos who wants to support the lets keep killing side.

 

stammer f**ked this up, getting to this point was predictable, the right words a while back could have headed this off. (a failure of leadership)

Yeah he has done really bad. I do think a free vote should have been allowed on such an emotive issue, though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, cellar said:

Yeah he has done really bad. I do think a free vote should have been allowed on such an emotive issue, though

just listening to nick Robinson saying that Blair lost huge support when he backed Israel over bombing Lebanon -  Robinson saying stammer has made a massive mistake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i see my mate* diddy is in trouble

(*spent an evening hanging with him at one of the big ibiza clubs, must have been summer 2001, jay kay too.)

always thought he was a dickhead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

There's a suggestion could be more resignations. This thing isn't going away.

I doubt that will happen, we’ve heard it before. 
 

It’s all rather curious how the usual suspects are up in arms over Labour whipping to abstain on the SNP motion (whilst having their own that went much deeper) yet say absolutely nothing about the Tories actually voting against both motions.

Edited by Ozanne
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Ozanne said:

I doubt that will happen, we’ve heard it before. 
 

It’s all rather curious how the usual suspects are up in arms over Labour whipping to abstain on the SNP motion (whilst having their own that went much deeper) yet say absolutely nothing about the Tories actually voting against both motions.

we heard before there were going to be resignations, and there were. 

With that vote the Tories were playing politics, as were SNP - they know this is a problem for Starmer. sh*tty world of politics that does nothing to actually help anyone in the middle east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

we heard before there were going to be resignations, and there were. 

With that vote the Tories were playing politics, as were SNP - they know this is a problem for Starmer. sh*tty world of politics that does nothing to actually help anyone in the middle east.


Thats one way to view it. The other way to view it is that the SNP just want a ceasefire in gaza and that Starmer made a miscalculation in both his assessment of where popular opinion lies within the labour base and in his ability to whip his MPs to go against that.

We have come to expect a cold rationality to Starmer’s positions but the bandwidth that politicians have to effect change is ultimately afforded to them by public confidence. If you aren’t also sensitive to the emotional aspect of public opinion then you will end up alienating your voters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ozanne said:

I doubt that will happen, we’ve heard it before. 
 

It’s all rather curious how the usual suspects are up in arms over Labour whipping to abstain on the SNP motion (whilst having their own that went much deeper) yet say absolutely nothing about the Tories actually voting against both motions.

Maybe because they expect better from Labour?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Western powers increasingly uneasy over Israeli actions

James Landale

Diplomatic correspondent
 

Quote

 

Almost day by day, the tone of Israel’s allies is hardening.

Overnight, the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken called Benny Gantz, a key member of Israel’s war cabinet. He said there was “an urgent need for affirmative steps to de-escalate tensions in the West Bank, including by confronting rising levels of settler extremist violence”.

About 200 Palestinians have been killed in the occupied territory since the 7 October attack on Israel. Arab diplomats are concerned there could be an explosion of violence in the West Bank that could escalate the conflict.

Blinken called Egypt’s foreign minister and stressed “the importance of concrete steps to minimise harm to Palestinian civilians in all of Gaza”. He also called his Jordanian counterpart and voiced his “deep concern” at a strike on a Jordanian medical facility in Gaza.

All this after the US for the first time chose not to veto a UN resolution that failed to condemn Hamas.

The UN Security Council passed a resolution on Wednesday that didn't include condemnation of Hamas

And it's not just the Americans. Earlier this week, the British PM gave a speech warning that too many Palestinians were losing their lives. And yesterday, the French president repeated his call for a humanitarian ceasefire, saying Israel’s right to defend itself did not justify bombing civilians.

Israel’s foreign minister, Eli Cohen, has suggested his country has “two or three weeks” before international pressure for a ceasefire could become overwhelming.

 

Finally the tide is starting to turn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...