Jump to content
  • Sign Up!

    Join our friendly community of music lovers and be part of the fun 😎

news & politics:discussion


zahidf

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Reckoner said:

I really don’t understand why people want PR over a preferential/transferable vote system. Surely the goal here is to stop tories winning seats with 40% of the fptp vote because the left/Centre left vote splits. 

A transferable vote system would be a type of PR. E.g Single Transferable vote which is probs the best one. 
 

don’t really understand what your point is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, fraybentos1 said:

A transferable vote system would be a type of PR. E.g Single Transferable vote which is probs the best one. 
 

don’t really understand what your point is 

My point is that you can still maintain single member districts  and have a voting system that stops people winning  those seats with less than a majority without needing to change everything and adopting PR regardless of its form. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Ozanne said:

That’s just incredible. 2 and a half years ago Labour were 20 points behind and now look at them. It isn’t a done deal but it’s so much better. 

better leader = 20 points gain.

crap leader like jez = 80 seat tory majority; look what you did momentum.

Edited by Neil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Neil said:

better leader = 20 points gain.

crap leader like jez = 80 seat tory majority; look what you did momentum.

Starmer definitely helped by shitness of govt though,and brexit totally screwed labour under corbyn...but yeah,maybe more people feel reassured by starmer than put off by his centrist blandness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, steviewevie said:

Starmer definitely helped by shitness of govt though,and brexit totally screwed labour under corbyn...but yeah,maybe more people feel reassured by starmer than put off by his centrist blandness.

corbvyn fed brexit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Neil said:

corbvyn fed brexit.

I don't know what that means, but brexit is not corbyn's fault. It was tricky for him, he was a eurosceptic who campaigned to stay in EU, and then he led a party who's MPs and membership were mostly remainers, but who's electorate was split. It almost became impossible for labour which way to go in 2019 once Johnson took over. In hindsight labour should have supported May's deal, although if that had passed we still might have ended up in the same place.

Edited by steviewevie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, steviewevie said:

I don't know what that means, but brexit is not corbyn's fault. It was tricky for him, he was a eurosceptic who campaigned to stay in EU, and then he led a party who's MPs and membership were mostly remainers, but who's electorate was split. It almost became impossible for labour which way to go in 2019 once Johnson took over. In hindsight labour should have supported May's deal, although if that had passed we still might have ended up in the same place.

corbyn's hate of the eu helped feed the leave vote, it gave left wingers the ok to vote leave. and he barely campaigned against brexit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Neil said:

corbyn's hate of the eu helped feed the leave vote, it gave left wingers the ok to vote leave. and he barely campaigned against brexit.

Some on the left didn't like the eu whatever corbyn thought. He still campaigned to remain, and most of the younger people who joined labour because of corbyn also wanted remain..it is the older union types who wanted out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...