You do always appear fair in trying to paint the picture from all sides which is admirable, but the continued stating as fact that the ICJ had concluded that the claim that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza was ‘plausible’ is simply not true.
The president of the ICJ clarified afterwards - though barely reported anywhere outside of tbe BBC interview where she said it - that the ruling declared that South Africa had a legal right to bring a case against Israel, and that Palestinians ‘had plausible rights to protection from genocide.’
Those words about ‘rights to protection from genocide’ were used by SA in their submission and reflect a quite obvious human right (to be not subjected to genocide) and aren’t exceptional in that respect. It’s hardly likely that the court would rule that they didn’t have such right.
If Dylan toured a greatest hits set, playing and singing the songs as they were recorded, I'd say he would be a much bigger live draw than he is now. But he doesn't, and it's generally just the real Bobcats go see him, and try and work out just what song he's actually playing
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.