Ticket tips and Tricks for 2025 festival

[Looother]

Thinking back to what Emily Eavis said in that BBC interview last year, it sounded like she thought the ideal ticket system would be one that gave everyone a chance, from the half-interested person idly logging in on their phone in bed on the off chance upwards, but that was able to be gamed to an extent by the obsessive and the desperate to weight it a bit in their favour. I've just checked, and the quote was:
 

Quote

 

"There are so many people that are registered for tickets. Half of them try really, really, really hard and half of them are not as bothered about coming. If we did a ballot we'd end up with people who weren't as bothered about coming. It's really hard to say this, but ... a lot of the time people who really, really want them do get them."

 

 

And I think this came really close to that. Obviously it was the first year, so people didn't really know how to play it, and as a result some who fall into the obsessive/desperate camp, including many in this community, didn't do everything they might have done with a bit more knowledge and experience, which smarts a bit. And it also turned out to be a bit more gameable than it probably should be, which does also. But I think it's a lot better than a simple ballot even now, and with a little bit of refinement could hit the nail squarely on the head.

[bennyboi]

Well after not getting a legit ticket since 2017, were all going legit next year! 

 

There was about 10 of us trying in various ways, one mate used the nerdy exploit and he got through twice! 

Meanwhile, the rest of us that were shooting straight, didnt get past 3-4bars! 

 

I feel dirty. 

[Andy0808 v5]

I think we can all agree we need a Day After tomorrow scenario, we’ll all love it and the fairweather attendees won’t.. and next year we’ll all be happy campers on ticket day 😇

[_kr.iss]

6 minutes ago, Andy0808 v5 said:

I think we can all agree we need a Day After tomorrow scenario, we’ll all love it and the fairweather attendees won’t.. and next year we’ll all be happy campers on ticket day 😇

 

Isn't 2026 a fallow year? But I like the spirit ☺️

[Andy0808 v5]

3 minutes ago, _kr.iss said:

 

Isn't 2026 a fallow year? But I like the spirit ☺️

God, I actually completely forgot about that.

[StoneCircle]

Any further comments trying to derail the thread will be deleted. 

 

As previously requested let's get back to discussion not personal attacks.

 

The Moderation Team 

Edited 1 hour ago by StoneCircle

[SilverLining]

28 minutes ago, bennyboi said:

Well after not getting a legit ticket since 2017, were all going legit next year! 

 

There was about 10 of us trying in various ways, one mate used the nerdy exploit and he got through twice! 

Meanwhile, the rest of us that were shooting straight, didnt get past 3-4bars! 

 

I feel dirty. 

Can someone exploit what the nerdy exploit was?

[Simsy]

1 hour ago, jonnytee1 said:

With supply Vs demand there will never be a "fair" way to do it that suits all. 

Exactly this, there will always be disappointed people as long as it's over-subscribed.

 

At least with the registration system we know that the tickets have gone to people who want them (even if they did use a hack/exploit/whatever to get them), rather than to touts who just want to flog them for a massive profit.

[TheGoodWillOut]

7 minutes ago, Simsy said:

Exactly this, there will always be disappointed people as long as it's over-subscribed.

 

At least with the registration system we know that the tickets have gone to people who want them (even if they did use a hack/exploit/whatever to get them), rather than to touts who just want to flog them for a massive profit.

and this is why glasto dont give a damn about backdoors, hacks or firefox containers.  They are happy that their tickets cant be touted easily and thats as far as it goes for them. 

 

If tickets were being viago-go'd, absolutely they would tighten things up but until then, nothing seriously will change. 

Edited 1 hour ago by TheGoodWillOut

[Flighty Zoo]

57 minutes ago, Looother said:

Thinking back to what Emily Eavis said in that BBC interview last year, it sounded like she thought the ideal ticket system would be one that gave everyone a chance, from the half-interested person idly logging in on their phone in bed on the off chance upwards, but that was able to be gamed to an extent by the obsessive and the desperate to weight it a bit in their favour. I've just checked, and the quote was:
 

 

And I think this came really close to that. Obviously it was the first year, so people didn't really know how to play it, and as a result some who fall into the obsessive/desperate camp, including many in this community, didn't do everything they might have done with a bit more knowledge and experience, which smarts a bit. And it also turned out to be a bit more gameable than it probably should be, which does also. But I think it's a lot better than a simple ballot even now, and with a little bit of refinement could hit the nail squarely on the head.

I think the spirit of this is right but it’s only really fair when See and Glastonbury take as many steps as possible to ensure that the system isn’t exploited. Now, an event of this size and the amount of demand, that is a logistical and technical nightmare and they try their best. But I’m completely with those who are calling for tickets that got bought from more unsavoury methods to be cancelled or at the very least for there to be some kind of ballot that rewards those putting in a small bit of effort. It teaches a lesson and levels the playing field yet again. Not that it would magically stop people from trying to game the system mind you. 
 

I first tried to get tickets in 2018 and had an abysmal failure, simply cause I didn’t know what to expect. 2019, I was a bit wiser and spaced out my refreshes and had multiple devices as per the advice I’d read and got tickets. 2022 - sailed right through on the coach sale after 10 minutes. Last year, one of my group got in literally a minute before sell out.  Each of those times, I improved my standing in terms of having committed people in groups, wiring computer to router, multiple devices etc. I learned from experience and from reading this forum. 

 

But it is objectively ridiculous that a music festival has a learning curve just for trying to buy tickets and that curve seems to be growing steeper and steeper every year. As a 20 something man, I can deal with it, but I feel for those teenagers who are hardcore music fans / musicians themselves and their parents who want to give them the opportunity to take them to the most famous festival in the world. Are we really moving into a society where the easiest way to go to Glastonbury is to become a moderately emerging artist yourself? Not everyone has the time and space to be thinking of joining a syndicate and anyone that’s justifying that as something that “works” should probably assess how crazy it is that we’ve gotten to this point in the first place. The whole thing when you step back and look at it is just silly and it doesn’t have to be this way. 
 

Your average person is going to be like “YASS, get in, finally got them” and their mates will promise them pints that are never honoured - but that is the spirit of things. They’ll have a great summer. Majority of us - you, reading this - will know what feels like and it is the nectar that gives the festival its magic, but everyone deserves a fair punt at experiencing that, no? I think that’s what we all agree on, right?

Edited 1 hour ago by Flighty Zoo

[Alvoram]

I had loads of devices running, loads of VMs running, I was trying everything. The only thing I was too afraid to try at all was using a bot and using VPNs, but that was only down to the fear of knowing what Akamai is (or should be) capable of. If I'd known I could get away with it I would. 

In the end, after all of that effort, it was a clean mobile device on 5g that got through. 2 VMs got very close, but no carrot.

We knew about the back page hack last year, and knew it still worked this year, I thought everyone knew, it was discussed enough on here and other platforms. Only reason I didn't use that for others in my group, when I got through, is because I'd used up so much of my time already, entering details, getting the blocked page, continually trying to refresh and go back to get past that block, then entering card details. If I could have got another group, I would have done. 

My issue with the sale, and the system, isn't down to people gaming the system. Of course people will game it, if you don't, somebody else will, that is never, ever going to change. Can't blame people for doing all they can. My issue is with See for not implementing all of queue-it / Akamai's protections properly, and for seemingly not killing the session properly upon a successful purchase. And so should yours be...

"Don't hate the player, hate the game."

If they're going to leave those doors open, you go ahead and walk right in... I would. 

[Clareno7]

1 hour ago, jonnytee1 said:

My take on this whole scenario is that anyone who says the have been to more than 10 Glastonburys in a row either 

 

1) Has more jam than Hartleys

2) Has manipulated the old system

 

The new system will not hold favour with a lot of people because its new and different. However if had been that way forever and then the festival changed to what we have had for the last 20 years  -  people wouldn't like that either.

 

With supply Vs demand there will never be a "fair" way to do it that suits all. 

 

Calling people names, having arguments is all pretty futile. To all those who got tickets well done, to all those who didn't try the resale or good luck in 2 years. 

 

I was lucky this year in a group of 5 friends we got tickets and i also went last year but there have been 10 (yes TEN) baron years before that for me in trying every year! I'd practically given up on ever going again! 

 

I've got more jam than Hartleys! I make loads of of it and I've been to more than 10 Glastonburys in a row and I want to reassure you that none of the people I've formed teams with (I've only ever worked in a group of six, membership of which varies each year), have the slightest bit of tech know how, we just use multiple devices, etc. I can only imagine it's the seedless blackberry jam.

[Suprefan]

59 minutes ago, SilverLining said:

Can someone exploit what the nerdy exploit was?

Which one. There was more than one lol

[Suprefan]

6 hours ago, Skip997 said:

This 

 

100% this. Never understand why Suprefan gets so much sh*t, he talks a lot of sense 

thanks. Nobody wants to hear the reality side of things. They dont look at the entire picture or want to look beyond it of whats coming. Or even fathom new ideas and such. Cause it all has to stay the same or else the festival isnt how its supposed to be. 

[jonnytee1]

47 minutes ago, Clareno7 said:

I've got more jam than Hartleys! I make loads of of it and I've been to more than 10 Glastonburys in a row and I want to reassure you that none of the people I've formed teams with (I've only ever worked in a group of six, membership of which varies each year), have the slightest bit of tech know how, we just use multiple devices, etc. I can only imagine it's the seedless blackberry jam.

 

Well you're a very jammy person then but i do prefer the seeded varieties 

[Skip997]

2 hours ago, jonnytee1 said:

My take on this whole scenario is that anyone who says the have been to more than 10 Glastonburys in a row either 

 

1) Has more jam than Hartleys

2) Has manipulated the old system

 

 

Or has built up loads of useful contacts over the decades and worked hard to maintain them and has worked hard on site thus ensuring they’re invited back 

[Nobody Interesting]

14 minutes ago, Skip997 said:

Or has built up loads of useful contacts over the decades and worked hard to maintain them and has worked hard on site thus ensuring they’re invited back 

 

Yep - a very important part of the festival as well. Over the years little things count to as we found. Do someone in a festival business a favour and they then reward you by way of thanks for what you sent their way.